User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45692830-20200510214412/@comment-45692830-20200511005647: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
My response was going to be something glib about "imagine if Faction Paradox (as a group of authors) somehow gets the rights to use the term 'Tardis', do you trust them to not intentionally do something to mess with that page?" But I think the broader issue is that I care more about having this discussion and coming down with a firm policy on it than I do any particular resolution. | My response was going to be something glib about "imagine if Faction Paradox (as a group of authors) somehow gets the rights to use the term 'Tardis', do you trust them to not intentionally do something to mess with that page?" But I think the broader issue is that I care more about having this discussion and coming down with a firm policy on it than I do any particular resolution. | ||
Perhaps we want a very bare bones version of Wikipedia's Wikipedia page, rather than our Wikipedia page. Effectively talking about what the site is and mentioning the stories it appears in, rather than what precisely occurred with it, simply to avoid the recursion. | Perhaps we want a very bare bones version of Wikipedia's Wikipedia page, rather than our Wikipedia page. Effectively talking about what the site is and mentioning the stories it appears in, rather than what precisely occurred with it, simply to avoid the recursion. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200510214412-45692830/20200511005647-45692830]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:20, 27 April 2023
My response was going to be something glib about "imagine if Faction Paradox (as a group of authors) somehow gets the rights to use the term 'Tardis', do you trust them to not intentionally do something to mess with that page?" But I think the broader issue is that I care more about having this discussion and coming down with a firm policy on it than I do any particular resolution.
Perhaps we want a very bare bones version of Wikipedia's Wikipedia page, rather than our Wikipedia page. Effectively talking about what the site is and mentioning the stories it appears in, rather than what precisely occurred with it, simply to avoid the recursion.
