User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45692830-20200723133026/@comment-6032121-20200723185024: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If it's valid, then yes, I think [[T:DAB]] is pretty straightforward on that point: it's a novel. | If it's valid, then yes, I think [[T:DAB]] is pretty straightforward on that point: it's a novel. | ||
In fact, even if stays invalid, I think it will ''still'' need a dab term. If the framing narrative involves the Doctor and Yaz getting trapped in the joke book, then presumably the joke book exists in-universe, so we need the undabbed namespace for the in-universe book. I could be wrong. | In fact, even if stays invalid, I think it will ''still'' need a dab term. If the framing narrative involves the Doctor and Yaz getting trapped in the joke book, then presumably the joke book exists in-universe, so we need the undabbed namespace for the in-universe book. I could be wrong. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200723133026-45692830/20200723185024-6032121]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:22, 27 April 2023
If it's valid, then yes, I think T:DAB is pretty straightforward on that point: it's a novel.
In fact, even if stays invalid, I think it will still need a dab term. If the framing narrative involves the Doctor and Yaz getting trapped in the joke book, then presumably the joke book exists in-universe, so we need the undabbed namespace for the in-universe book. I could be wrong.
