User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45692830-20200723133026/@comment-6032121-20200724155523: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In my opinion, the quote makes it clear that the intent is for the entire book to cohere as a novel; it's inconvenient that there's no direct reference in the 13/Yaz frame story to the jokes around them, but the sheer presentation of the thing is, I think, pretty clear on the matter. I'm still in favour of considering the thing a "(novel)". | In my opinion, the quote makes it clear that the intent is for the entire book to cohere as a novel; it's inconvenient that there's no direct reference in the 13/Yaz frame story to the jokes around them, but the sheer presentation of the thing is, I think, pretty clear on the matter. I'm still in favour of considering the thing a "(novel)". | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200723133026-45692830/20200724155523-6032121]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:22, 27 April 2023
In my opinion, the quote makes it clear that the intent is for the entire book to cohere as a novel; it's inconvenient that there's no direct reference in the 13/Yaz frame story to the jokes around them, but the sheer presentation of the thing is, I think, pretty clear on the matter. I'm still in favour of considering the thing a "(novel)".
