User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45692830-20200723133026/@comment-6032121-20200724171147: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Yeah, when I say "cover it as a (novel)" I'm bundling it in with the question of whether the whole book is valid or not, because if only the frame segments are valid and we deem the "jokes" to not be part of the same story, then the frame segments can only be a short story. | Yeah, when I say "cover it as a (novel)" I'm bundling it in with the question of whether the whole book is valid or not, because if only the frame segments are valid and we deem the "jokes" to not be part of the same story, then the frame segments can only be a short story. | ||
That being said, phrasing the question as "is the whole book valid or just the framing segment" is just making me realise how close to the precedent of [[Thread:213311]] this is. We don't have Thirteen and Yaz directly commenting on the jokes here, as we did with Hob, but still. | That being said, phrasing the question as "is the whole book valid or just the framing segment" is just making me realise how close to the precedent of [[Thread:213311]] this is. We don't have Thirteen and Yaz directly commenting on the jokes here, as we did with Hob, but still. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200723133026-45692830/20200724171147-6032121]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:22, 27 April 2023
Yeah, when I say "cover it as a (novel)" I'm bundling it in with the question of whether the whole book is valid or not, because if only the frame segments are valid and we deem the "jokes" to not be part of the same story, then the frame segments can only be a short story.
That being said, phrasing the question as "is the whole book valid or just the framing segment" is just making me realise how close to the precedent of Thread:213311 this is. We don't have Thirteen and Yaz directly commenting on the jokes here, as we did with Hob, but still.
