User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-4028641-20170222202844: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-4028641-20170222202844'''
I believe the major reason that it's been declared invalid over the years is that the story has an iffy license. It was made to be aired once and never released, no one was payed for it, etc. It's also why we don't allow images from it, but we do allow images from the broadcasts previewing it just before airing. It's quite bizarre.
I believe the major reason that it's been declared invalid over the years is that the story has an iffy license. It was made to be aired once and never released, no one was payed for it, etc. It's also why we don't allow images from it, but we do allow images from the broadcasts previewing it just before airing. It's quite bizarre.


Line 5: Line 4:


A big question for me is that it's impossible to really explain what actually happens in the story. It plays like it's had four writers working independently and not communicating at all. I wouldn't know how to describe it ''in'' an in-universe fashion.
A big question for me is that it's impossible to really explain what actually happens in the story. It plays like it's had four writers working independently and not communicating at all. I wouldn't know how to describe it ''in'' an in-universe fashion.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170222095120-5.2.105.85/20170222202844-4028641]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 15:23, 27 April 2023

I believe the major reason that it's been declared invalid over the years is that the story has an iffy license. It was made to be aired once and never released, no one was payed for it, etc. It's also why we don't allow images from it, but we do allow images from the broadcasts previewing it just before airing. It's quite bizarre.

Don't be shocked if an admin shuts this down very quickly. I think this is one of the debates that people have had on the wiki the most. Someone tries to re-open it every few years.

A big question for me is that it's impossible to really explain what actually happens in the story. It plays like it's had four writers working independently and not communicating at all. I wouldn't know how to describe it in an in-universe fashion.