User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170223143901: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
AeD wrote: | AeD wrote: | ||
| Line 8: | Line 7: | ||
Yes, I couldn't agree more. The only authorial intent was JNT saying he doesn't care, but authors have said that about their own VNA novels. All I can say that JNT at the time of writing and airing considered it DWU. | Yes, I couldn't agree more. The only authorial intent was JNT saying he doesn't care, but authors have said that about their own VNA novels. All I can say that JNT at the time of writing and airing considered it DWU. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170222095120-5.2.105.85/20170223143901-5.2.105.85]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:24, 27 April 2023
AeD wrote: I'm not particularly interested in fighting over Dimensions in Time, of all things, but yeah, I basically agree with OP.
People not being paid to do it, discontinuity with EastEnders, it being weird as heck, etcetera, I don't see anything that means it doesn't pass the four little rules -- it's a story, the BBC owns both Doctor Who and EastEnders, it aired on BBC One, and though I can't speak for authorial or producer intent, watching it, it certainly doesn't seem to me to be meant to be set outside the DWU.
Yes, I couldn't agree more. The only authorial intent was JNT saying he doesn't care, but authors have said that about their own VNA novels. All I can say that JNT at the time of writing and airing considered it DWU.
