User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-82.3.146.201-20170225142813: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-82.3.146.201-20170225142813'''
Having read some of the reasons, the only reason that keeps popping up is that it is discontinuous which in itself is a ridiculous argument.  
Having read some of the reasons, the only reason that keeps popping up is that it is discontinuous which in itself is a ridiculous argument.  


Line 5: Line 4:


- Then the 4 little rules are just there, and not being used. A story '''can't be invalid because''' Timothy Tarrent from Dublin hates it.
- Then the 4 little rules are just there, and not being used. A story '''can't be invalid because''' Timothy Tarrent from Dublin hates it.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170222095120-5.2.105.85/20170225142813-82.3.146.201]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 15:24, 27 April 2023

Having read some of the reasons, the only reason that keeps popping up is that it is discontinuous which in itself is a ridiculous argument.

If Dimensions in Time does not get declared valid, on the reasons that it is discontinuous, people hate it, it's a bit silly, that DWM four years later or negative acceptance and opinion.

- Then the 4 little rules are just there, and not being used. A story can't be invalid because Timothy Tarrent from Dublin hates it.