User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5545417-20150725190725/@comment-4028641-20150824194528: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5545417-20150725190725/@comment-4028641-20150824194528'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
CzechOut wrote:
CzechOut wrote:
Line 7: Line 6:


In all seriousness, I think the issue here was weather or not the TITANS series being an advertisement (which is pretty much is) is enough for it to be non-valid. I don't think so.
In all seriousness, I think the issue here was weather or not the TITANS series being an advertisement (which is pretty much is) is enough for it to be non-valid. I don't think so.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20150725190725-5545417/20150824194528-4028641]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 15:27, 27 April 2023

CzechOut wrote: ... It certainly doesn't posit that the First Doctor was using sweet cigs or anything of the kind.)

An Unearthly Child did that just fine.

In all seriousness, I think the issue here was weather or not the TITANS series being an advertisement (which is pretty much is) is enough for it to be non-valid. I don't think so.