User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-95.145.155.227-20171125234745/@comment-1506468-20190916171044: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Closing the thread as the general consensus is that the anthology should be deemed (for the most part) valid. Stories in the anthology with clear authorial intent to be set in the DWU are deemed valid, whereas those stories highlighted in this thread which aren't meant to be taken seriously will continue to be deemed as invalid. | Closing the thread as the general consensus is that the anthology should be deemed (for the most part) valid. Stories in the anthology with clear authorial intent to be set in the DWU are deemed valid, whereas those stories highlighted in this thread which aren't meant to be taken seriously will continue to be deemed as invalid. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20171125234745-95.145.155.227/20190916171044-1506468]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:40, 27 April 2023
Closing the thread as the general consensus is that the anthology should be deemed (for the most part) valid. Stories in the anthology with clear authorial intent to be set in the DWU are deemed valid, whereas those stories highlighted in this thread which aren't meant to be taken seriously will continue to be deemed as invalid.
