User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-95.145.155.227-20171125234745/@comment-31010985-20171226182256: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-95.145.155.227-20171125234745/@comment-31010985-20171226182256'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
RingoRoadagain wrote:
RingoRoadagain wrote:
Line 13: Line 12:


If you think only everything in the "Poems which acknowledge invalid elements" should be invalid can I clarify your position on ''Ode to a Krynoid'' which has a very dodgy narrative please?
If you think only everything in the "Poems which acknowledge invalid elements" should be invalid can I clarify your position on ''Ode to a Krynoid'' which has a very dodgy narrative please?
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20171125234745-95.145.155.227/20171226182256-31010985]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 15:40, 27 April 2023

RingoRoadagain wrote: I would just add that "Shortness of Breath" is also from a 1st person POV ("are you my repeated meme", "my two left feet" and "have we done dancing")

Also just to be sure, you think "Next Episode" should be invalid because of "the internet is aflame" bit, right? (because I would agree with that)

Now based on this list I would personally think that everything except "Poems which acknowledge invalid elements" should be valid.

Good spot with Shortness of Breath! I originally missed the reference to it being told in the first person so had got it down as having no narrative. I will move it into the 1st person category if that's okay with everyone.

I invalidated Next Episode because of "I'll be back next week" but your point still stands as well.

If you think only everything in the "Poems which acknowledge invalid elements" should be invalid can I clarify your position on Ode to a Krynoid which has a very dodgy narrative please?