User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1317169-20121202170842/@comment-188432-20130111221905: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't want to derail the conversation, especially since we seem to be able to find some common ground here. But I do feel compelled to note that we '''are''' editors. It is our job to note what information is appropriate for an article. Definitionally, we do cut information, all the time. | I don't want to derail the conversation, especially since we seem to be able to find some common ground here. But I do feel compelled to note that we '''are''' editors. It is our job to note what information is appropriate for an article. Definitionally, we do cut information, all the time. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
So that's why I say I support the inclusion of "hairdryer" at ''[[Dalek (TV story)|Dalek]]'' only in an inline list. And if that inline list isn't available, then it ''certainly'' doesn't deserve the space afforded by a bulleted list. | So that's why I say I support the inclusion of "hairdryer" at ''[[Dalek (TV story)|Dalek]]'' only in an inline list. And if that inline list isn't available, then it ''certainly'' doesn't deserve the space afforded by a bulleted list. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20121202170842-1317169/20130111221905-188432]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 20:46, 27 April 2023
I don't want to derail the conversation, especially since we seem to be able to find some common ground here. But I do feel compelled to note that we are editors. It is our job to note what information is appropriate for an article. Definitionally, we do cut information, all the time.
I'm not advocating we delete the article hairdryer. I'm just saying that of all the things one might have noted about Dalek, that little bit is towards the irrelevant end of the scale.
So that's why I say I support the inclusion of "hairdryer" at Dalek only in an inline list. And if that inline list isn't available, then it certainly doesn't deserve the space afforded by a bulleted list.
