User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744/@comment-5918438-20200319062042: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
No need to beat down what's put out when the intent is clear. | No need to beat down what's put out when the intent is clear. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
EDIT: They're called bullets/bullet points. Of course they are. The world makes sense now. :P | EDIT: They're called bullets/bullet points. Of course they are. The world makes sense now. :P | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200302103744-1783865/20200319062042-5918438]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:19, 27 April 2023
No need to beat down what's put out when the intent is clear.
(Personally, I stand by the division between 11 and 12, rather than 8 and War. It will fill out, in time, and would be sure not to get unwieldy, requiring no future judgment calls on where to cut it next.)
(I also think a line break is a good substitute on its own for a .. • [what are those symbols actually called?], or at least it's always seemed cleaner to me that way.)
EDIT: They're called bullets/bullet points. Of course they are. The world makes sense now. :P
