User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1827503-20141023232658/@comment-1293767-20151028051004: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1827503-20141023232658/@comment-1293767-20151028051004'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
OttselSpy25 wrote:
OttselSpy25 wrote:
Line 8: Line 7:


But I guess that discussion answers my question: this only briefly discusses "to be continued" and not "the Doctor will return"/variations. Since AGMGTW does not end with a TBC, that still leaves the original question posed in this thread unanswered. I'm also surprised that we would use an unresolved discussion between two people over six posts (three if you consider that that "I just answered my own question), ''Utopia'', ''The Sound of Drums'' and ''The Last of the Time Lords'' all end on to be continued don't they?" doesn't even come up until post #4) as a precedent for something like this.
But I guess that discussion answers my question: this only briefly discusses "to be continued" and not "the Doctor will return"/variations. Since AGMGTW does not end with a TBC, that still leaves the original question posed in this thread unanswered. I'm also surprised that we would use an unresolved discussion between two people over six posts (three if you consider that that "I just answered my own question), ''Utopia'', ''The Sound of Drums'' and ''The Last of the Time Lords'' all end on to be continued don't they?" doesn't even come up until post #4) as a precedent for something like this.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20141023232658-1827503/20151028051004-1293767]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:22, 27 April 2023

OttselSpy25 wrote: Uh, guys... We're gonna look like idiots for this, but Czech linked to the discussion in question in his post

Collective facepalms everyone. It's times like these I wish the links in here would show up with an underline or different color. I'm so used to that on a lot of sites I forget to check on sites that don't do that.

But I guess that discussion answers my question: this only briefly discusses "to be continued" and not "the Doctor will return"/variations. Since AGMGTW does not end with a TBC, that still leaves the original question posed in this thread unanswered. I'm also surprised that we would use an unresolved discussion between two people over six posts (three if you consider that that "I just answered my own question), Utopia, The Sound of Drums and The Last of the Time Lords all end on to be continued don't they?" doesn't even come up until post #4) as a precedent for something like this.