User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1827503-20141102022000/@comment-90.196.60.87-20141102171128: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1827503-20141102022000/@comment-90.196.60.87-20141102171128'''
This is a classic of putting subjective biased opinions before content. You hope the characters lying. What you have right now is this page - [[Missy]] linking the Master, whereby there's 0 content about Missy in the article re-directed too. The logical thing to do would be to put a Missy section in the Master article, with a spoiler template above it, that takes a neutral tone saying the "character claims to be the Master" or something to that end. There are lots of people who might want to know more about this Missy character. They won't find anything on this Wiki about it without great difficulty and so these potential new editors are unlikely to be very eager to contribute to this Wiki. A wiki that's out of date on the basis of a subjective opinion a few editors playing the system have. Suppressing good content about characters on the off-chance something depicted is a lie, or some sort of Dallas style dream is the most absurd thing I've ever read in regards to a Wiki in over ten years. Easily.
This is a classic of putting subjective biased opinions before content. You hope the characters lying. What you have right now is this page - [[Missy]] linking the Master, whereby there's 0 content about Missy in the article re-directed too. The logical thing to do would be to put a Missy section in the Master article, with a spoiler template above it, that takes a neutral tone saying the "character claims to be the Master" or something to that end. There are lots of people who might want to know more about this Missy character. They won't find anything on this Wiki about it without great difficulty and so these potential new editors are unlikely to be very eager to contribute to this Wiki. A wiki that's out of date on the basis of a subjective opinion a few editors playing the system have. Suppressing good content about characters on the off-chance something depicted is a lie, or some sort of Dallas style dream is the most absurd thing I've ever read in regards to a Wiki in over ten years. Easily.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20141102022000-1827503/20141102171128-90.196.60.87]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:26, 27 April 2023

This is a classic of putting subjective biased opinions before content. You hope the characters lying. What you have right now is this page - Missy linking the Master, whereby there's 0 content about Missy in the article re-directed too. The logical thing to do would be to put a Missy section in the Master article, with a spoiler template above it, that takes a neutral tone saying the "character claims to be the Master" or something to that end. There are lots of people who might want to know more about this Missy character. They won't find anything on this Wiki about it without great difficulty and so these potential new editors are unlikely to be very eager to contribute to this Wiki. A wiki that's out of date on the basis of a subjective opinion a few editors playing the system have. Suppressing good content about characters on the off-chance something depicted is a lie, or some sort of Dallas style dream is the most absurd thing I've ever read in regards to a Wiki in over ten years. Easily.