User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20121207092215/@comment-188432-20121208023237: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I feel you on the word "wiki". You've well explained why that word doesn't work. | I feel you on the word "wiki". You've well explained why that word doesn't work. | ||
I wanna ask this question — not specifically of you, Imamadmad, but sort of anyone in the thread. If Tardis Wiki doesn't work, should we attempt to go for the item which has the strength of being within continuity? It's longer and it's a design nightmare in the wordmark, but is there any traction for the name '''Tardis Information System'''? | I wanna ask this question — not specifically of you, Imamadmad, but sort of anyone in the thread. If Tardis Wiki doesn't work, should we attempt to go for the item which has the strength of being within continuity? It's longer and it's a design nightmare in the wordmark, but is there any traction for the name '''Tardis Information System'''? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20121207092215-188432/20121208023237-188432]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:29, 27 April 2023
I feel you on the word "wiki". You've well explained why that word doesn't work.
I wanna ask this question — not specifically of you, Imamadmad, but sort of anyone in the thread. If Tardis Wiki doesn't work, should we attempt to go for the item which has the strength of being within continuity? It's longer and it's a design nightmare in the wordmark, but is there any traction for the name Tardis Information System?
