User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-1293767-20130401162215: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
Imamadmad wrote: | Imamadmad wrote: | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
I'm firmly '''against''' one page. Ideally, I'd like to have three pages, but I could live with five pages to avoid the speculative madness that would be a single page that nobody can prove is the same woman three times. | I'm firmly '''against''' one page. Ideally, I'd like to have three pages, but I could live with five pages to avoid the speculative madness that would be a single page that nobody can prove is the same woman three times. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130401162215-1293767]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:42, 27 April 2023
Imamadmad wrote:
Can people please state which position they are arguing for?! And then can we actually get back to talking about how we will divide this character's pages?
I'm firmly against one page. Ideally, I'd like to have three pages, but I could live with five pages to avoid the speculative madness that would be a single page that nobody can prove is the same woman three times.
