User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-6433721-20130331231828: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It's not rejecting evidence, it's deciding the default position to argue from. There's not enough evidence either way, dude. That's why the argument keeps going. You have to make a definition of default. | It's not rejecting evidence, it's deciding the default position to argue from. There's not enough evidence either way, dude. That's why the argument keeps going. You have to make a definition of default. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130331231828-6433721]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:50, 27 April 2023
It's not rejecting evidence, it's deciding the default position to argue from. There's not enough evidence either way, dude. That's why the argument keeps going. You have to make a definition of default.
