User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-88790-20130325142902: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The stacked approach is a good one which neatly avoids a lot of the speculative language that was used in the previously combined article. | The stacked approach is a good one which neatly avoids a lot of the speculative language that was used in the previously combined article. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
Although I agree that waiting until ''TBOSJ'' has been broadcast would leave us with more information. | Although I agree that waiting until ''TBOSJ'' has been broadcast would leave us with more information. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130325142902-88790]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:51, 27 April 2023
The stacked approach is a good one which neatly avoids a lot of the speculative language that was used in the previously combined article.
If a combined article could continue without devolving into speculation between the subheadings I wouldn't be against merging all the articles we've got at the moment.
Although I agree that waiting until TBOSJ has been broadcast would leave us with more information.
