User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-20607870-20151229221412: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retitle|The Panopticon/Individual Incarnations of the Master}} | |||
How about individual incarnations of the master pages, like the Doctor (a main one and individual). We don't specifically know the numbering of the Master except that Delgado-Pratt-Beevers are all the same incarnation, 13. But when as this ever mattered, if it did The War Doctor would become nine and the ninth would become 10 and so on. The titles could be based on conjecture for example (""Tremas" Master" is a title based upon conjecture.)like Donna's World ("Donna's World" is a title based upon conjecture.). So how about individual Master pages like this; | How about individual incarnations of the master pages, like the Doctor (a main one and individual). We don't specifically know the numbering of the Master except that Delgado-Pratt-Beevers are all the same incarnation, 13. But when as this ever mattered, if it did The War Doctor would become nine and the ninth would become 10 and so on. The titles could be based on conjecture for example (""Tremas" Master" is a title based upon conjecture.)like Donna's World ("Donna's World" is a title based upon conjecture.). So how about individual Master pages like this; | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Missy or Mistress or ("Missy" Master is a title based upon conjecture.) or ("Missy" is a title based upon conjecture.) | Missy or Mistress or ("Missy" Master is a title based upon conjecture.) or ("Missy" is a title based upon conjecture.) | ||
How about that, we just need to decide as a group if this is what the wiki shall do, hence why I brought it to the Panopticon for discussion. | How about that, we just need to decide as a group if this is what the wiki shall do, hence why I brought it to the Panopticon for discussion. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20151229221412-20607870]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 22:19, 27 April 2023
How about individual incarnations of the master pages, like the Doctor (a main one and individual). We don't specifically know the numbering of the Master except that Delgado-Pratt-Beevers are all the same incarnation, 13. But when as this ever mattered, if it did The War Doctor would become nine and the ninth would become 10 and so on. The titles could be based on conjecture for example (""Tremas" Master" is a title based upon conjecture.)like Donna's World ("Donna's World" is a title based upon conjecture.). So how about individual Master pages like this;
First Master (We know this from The Sound of Drums) William Hughes (Maybe 2nd-12th individually as we know they exist from The Deadly Assassin and The Dark Path) Thirteenth Master (As we know The Deadly Assassin, Legacy of the Daleks) Delgado, Pratt, Beevers and the "John Smith" version which is practically this master reverted to before body jumping. "Tremas" Master ("Tremas" Master is a title based upon conjecture.) Ainley, Tipple (If not confirmed behind the scenes section) "Bruce" Master ("Bruce" Master is a title based upon conjecture.) Eric Roberts, Paul McGann "Tzun" Master ("Tzun" Master is a title based upon conjecture.) War Master ("War" Master is a title based upon conjecture.) Alex MacQueen Yana or "Yana" Master ("Yana" Master is a title based upon conjecture.) Derek Jacobi Harold Saxon or "Saxon" Master ("Saxon" Master is a title based upon conjecture.) John Simm Missy or Mistress or ("Missy" Master is a title based upon conjecture.) or ("Missy" is a title based upon conjecture.)
How about that, we just need to decide as a group if this is what the wiki shall do, hence why I brought it to the Panopticon for discussion.
