User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20170121220436/@comment-24894325-20170122231341: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
NateBumber wrote: | NateBumber wrote: | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
I am happy that you agree that your edit to the infobox of [[The Doctor's TARDIS]] (DT) that claimed that Lolita is the sister of DT because it is stated in some story that she is the sister of "the Ship" was not based on a valid approved in-universe evidence (and maybe, just maybe was a bit of a speculation). | I am happy that you agree that your edit to the infobox of [[The Doctor's TARDIS]] (DT) that claimed that Lolita is the sister of DT because it is stated in some story that she is the sister of "the Ship" was not based on a valid approved in-universe evidence (and maybe, just maybe was a bit of a speculation). | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20170121220436-24894325/20170122231341-24894325]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 22:33, 27 April 2023
NateBumber wrote: While I freely admit that the Ship might be a different matter, the fact that Lolita (a timeship) is a TARDIS has already been decided.
I am happy that you agree that your edit to the infobox of The Doctor's TARDIS (DT) that claimed that Lolita is the sister of DT because it is stated in some story that she is the sister of "the Ship" was not based on a valid approved in-universe evidence (and maybe, just maybe was a bit of a speculation).
