User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-25117610-20190317164532: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retitle|The Panopticon/Main Range categories}} | |||
I initially brought this matter to [[User talk:SOTO#Main Range in infoboxes|SOTO in their talk page]], but was encouraged to bring this to a forum in [[User talk:OncomingStorm12th#Main Range categories|my talk page]]. So, my idea is: [[:Category:Doctor Who monthly audio stories]] needs renaming because it doesn't match the [[Main Range|series page's name]]. | I initially brought this matter to [[User talk:SOTO#Main Range in infoboxes|SOTO in their talk page]], but was encouraged to bring this to a forum in [[User talk:OncomingStorm12th#Main Range categories|my talk page]]. So, my idea is: [[:Category:Doctor Who monthly audio stories]] needs renaming because it doesn't match the [[Main Range|series page's name]]. | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
For the latter, there's no exact precedent, as far as I know, but I think it's a good idea, because it helps to "clean up" categories like [[:Category:2018 audio stories]], which would then have 15 stories, rather than the current 28. This way, users can more easily navigate through more sporatic stories (like the ''[[Subscriber Short Trips]]'' and ''[[Cardiff Unknown - October 2018 (audio story)|Cardiff Unknown - October 2018]]''. | For the latter, there's no exact precedent, as far as I know, but I think it's a good idea, because it helps to "clean up" categories like [[:Category:2018 audio stories]], which would then have 15 stories, rather than the current 28. This way, users can more easily navigate through more sporatic stories (like the ''[[Subscriber Short Trips]]'' and ''[[Cardiff Unknown - October 2018 (audio story)|Cardiff Unknown - October 2018]]''. | ||
The main concert for the "stories by year" would be naming: as SOTO pointed out in my talk page: ''"Main Range/2019 audio stories" would be highly irregular, but I don't see why something like "2019 Main Range audio stories" should be off the table''. | The main concert for the "stories by year" would be naming: as SOTO pointed out in my talk page: ''"Main Range/2019 audio stories" would be highly irregular, but I don't see why something like "2019 Main Range audio stories" should be off the table''. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20190317164532-25117610]]</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 22:38, 27 April 2023
I initially brought this matter to SOTO in their talk page, but was encouraged to bring this to a forum in my talk page. So, my idea is: Category:Doctor Who monthly audio stories needs renaming because it doesn't match the series page's name.
But while we would use a bot to do it, I proprosed two new types of categories to be implemented as well: one for "Main Range stories by Doctor" and one for "Main Range stories by year".
The former is supported by categories like Category:Tenth Doctor NSA novels and Category:Fourth Doctor DWM comic stories. So I think it's only fair to have Category:Seventh Doctor Main Range audio stories, et al.
For the latter, there's no exact precedent, as far as I know, but I think it's a good idea, because it helps to "clean up" categories like Category:2018 audio stories, which would then have 15 stories, rather than the current 28. This way, users can more easily navigate through more sporatic stories (like the Subscriber Short Trips and Cardiff Unknown - October 2018.
The main concert for the "stories by year" would be naming: as SOTO pointed out in my talk page: "Main Range/2019 audio stories" would be highly irregular, but I don't see why something like "2019 Main Range audio stories" should be off the table.