User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-26010067-20190619015112/@comment-26010067-20190619073311: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-26010067-20190619015112/@comment-26010067-20190619073311'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
Shambala108 wrote:
Shambala108 wrote:
Line 6: Line 5:


[[User:Shambala108]], could you please clarify what do you mean by "stubs" here? [[:Category:Stubs|Stub articles]]? Or do the hatnotes not have enough text in them? Article [[Matt Smith]] does not seem like a stub to me, nor its lead section.
[[User:Shambala108]], could you please clarify what do you mean by "stubs" here? [[:Category:Stubs|Stub articles]]? Or do the hatnotes not have enough text in them? Article [[Matt Smith]] does not seem like a stub to me, nor its lead section.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20190619015112-26010067/20190619073311-26010067]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 22:41, 27 April 2023

Shambala108 wrote: ... the hope is that any stubs will eventually be filled out enough ...

User:Shambala108, could you please clarify what do you mean by "stubs" here? Stub articles? Or do the hatnotes not have enough text in them? Article Matt Smith does not seem like a stub to me, nor its lead section.