User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-3999524-20141211184047/@comment-188432-20141212031054: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-3999524-20141211184047/@comment-188432-20141212031054'''
It's not Susan thinking that there's no way for him to regenerate. It's the omniscient narrator saying that, flatly.  Besides, he ''doesn't'' regenerate. That's the point. At no point in the book does it suggest that he in anyway regenerated when he went from being Delgado to being Pratt. They are very much the same incarnation of the Master at different points on his quite singular timeline.
It's not Susan thinking that there's no way for him to regenerate. It's the omniscient narrator saying that, flatly.  Besides, he ''doesn't'' regenerate. That's the point. At no point in the book does it suggest that he in anyway regenerated when he went from being Delgado to being Pratt. They are very much the same incarnation of the Master at different points on his quite singular timeline.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20141211184047-3999524/20141212031054-188432]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 23:12, 27 April 2023

It's not Susan thinking that there's no way for him to regenerate. It's the omniscient narrator saying that, flatly. Besides, he doesn't regenerate. That's the point. At no point in the book does it suggest that he in anyway regenerated when he went from being Delgado to being Pratt. They are very much the same incarnation of the Master at different points on his quite singular timeline.