User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20150828141837/@comment-1432718-20150903015331: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
HarveyWallbanger wrote: | HarveyWallbanger wrote: | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Except that very few users ever read the category definition pages before using the categories. And, as this forum thread shows, different users have different ideas of what the definition should be. This is a classic example of a category that violates [[Tardis:Category naming conventions]]. | Except that very few users ever read the category definition pages before using the categories. And, as this forum thread shows, different users have different ideas of what the definition should be. This is a classic example of a category that violates [[Tardis:Category naming conventions]]. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20150828141837-4028641/20150903015331-1432718]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:16, 27 April 2023
HarveyWallbanger wrote: A less severe decision would be defining together a criterion to put in the description of the category, for instance: a multi-Doctor story requires the interaction of at least two regular incarnations of the Doctor. In my eyes, deleting the category at all would make our Wiki poorer.
Except that very few users ever read the category definition pages before using the categories. And, as this forum thread shows, different users have different ideas of what the definition should be. This is a classic example of a category that violates Tardis:Category naming conventions.
