User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20151008023030/@comment-1827503-20191106220434: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In any case, what this thread has proven is that it's very hard to outright assign a number to any adult Master incarnation. So unless something obvious is being overlooked, we can't use numbering to solve the debate laid out in the OP four years ago. | In any case, what this thread has proven is that it's very hard to outright assign a number to any adult Master incarnation. So unless something obvious is being overlooked, we can't use numbering to solve the debate laid out in the OP four years ago. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20151008023030-4028641/20191106220434-1827503]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:19, 27 April 2023
In any case, what this thread has proven is that it's very hard to outright assign a number to any adult Master incarnation. So unless something obvious is being overlooked, we can't use numbering to solve the debate laid out in the OP four years ago.
