User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20151008023030/@comment-30325516-20191107223015: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think if we can identify clear evidence that Tipple is a distinct incarnation/body/Master in his own write and that wasn’t just a body double for a pre-existing Master then he should certainly have a section of his own, and it’d be wrong not to. However as far as I’m aware so far, the only clear evidence we have of him being a distinct Master is from behind the scenes content, which we can’t use as a source. | I think if we can identify clear evidence that Tipple is a distinct incarnation/body/Master in his own write and that wasn’t just a body double for a pre-existing Master then he should certainly have a section of his own, and it’d be wrong not to. However as far as I’m aware so far, the only clear evidence we have of him being a distinct Master is from behind the scenes content, which we can’t use as a source. | ||
There’s certainly nothing preventing him from existing, but there’s also not a lot to suggest that he does. Again from an in-Universe perspective as I myself personally consider Tipple to be Beevers in a stolen body. | There’s certainly nothing preventing him from existing, but there’s also not a lot to suggest that he does. Again from an in-Universe perspective as I myself personally consider Tipple to be Beevers in a stolen body. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20151008023030-4028641/20191107223015-30325516]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:19, 27 April 2023
I think if we can identify clear evidence that Tipple is a distinct incarnation/body/Master in his own write and that wasn’t just a body double for a pre-existing Master then he should certainly have a section of his own, and it’d be wrong not to. However as far as I’m aware so far, the only clear evidence we have of him being a distinct Master is from behind the scenes content, which we can’t use as a source.
There’s certainly nothing preventing him from existing, but there’s also not a lot to suggest that he does. Again from an in-Universe perspective as I myself personally consider Tipple to be Beevers in a stolen body.
