User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4139960-20121217140825: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4139960-20121217140825'''
{{retitle|The Panopticon/Characters named only in novelisations}}
I noticed in a couple of places that unnamed characters who are named in novelisations have their novelisation names mentioned as a side-note (as with [[Pilot (The Horns of Nimon)|Pilot]] and [[Co-pilot (The Horns of Nimon)]]).
I noticed in a couple of places that unnamed characters who are named in novelisations have their novelisation names mentioned as a side-note (as with [[Pilot (The Horns of Nimon)|Pilot]] and [[Co-pilot (The Horns of Nimon)]]).


[[Tardis:Valid sources/Detailed list]] mentions that television info supercedes novelisation info when in conflict. Is an unnamed character having a name actually a conflict or contradiction with what's in the story?  {{retitle|///Characters named only in novelisations}}
[[Tardis:Valid sources/Detailed list]] mentions that television info supercedes novelisation info when in conflict. Is an unnamed character having a name actually a conflict or contradiction with what's in the story?   
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20121217140825-4139960]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 23:29, 27 April 2023

I noticed in a couple of places that unnamed characters who are named in novelisations have their novelisation names mentioned as a side-note (as with Pilot and Co-pilot (The Horns of Nimon)).

Tardis:Valid sources/Detailed list mentions that television info supercedes novelisation info when in conflict. Is an unnamed character having a name actually a conflict or contradiction with what's in the story?