User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-43908-20140105020249: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-43908-20140105020249'''
{{retitle|The Panopticon/Actor headshots - leave portrait or crop widescreen?}}
The image upload page, [[Tardis:Image use policy]], [[Help:Image cheat card]], and other areas of the wiki stress the use of widescreen aspect rations on everything except video/book covers, where tall aspect ratio is unavoidable.
The image upload page, [[Tardis:Image use policy]], [[Help:Image cheat card]], and other areas of the wiki stress the use of widescreen aspect rations on everything except video/book covers, where tall aspect ratio is unavoidable.


I'm wondering what folks here think of the rule's effect on actors' promotional headshots, which are traditionally made in portrait orientation.  The headshots are often great for adding to actors' pages, but should they be cropped wide (which is not always actually possible to do while retaining the actor's features) or should an exception to the rule be made for them? — [[User:Rob T Firefly|Rob T Firefly]] - '''[[User talk:Rob T Firefly|Δ]][[Special:Contributions/Rob T Firefly|∇]]''' - 02:02, January 5, 2014 (UTC) {{retitle|///Actor headshots - leave portrait or crop widescreen?}}
I'm wondering what folks here think of the rule's effect on actors' promotional headshots, which are traditionally made in portrait orientation.  The headshots are often great for adding to actors' pages, but should they be cropped wide (which is not always actually possible to do while retaining the actor's features) or should an exception to the rule be made for them? — [[User:Rob T Firefly|Rob T Firefly]] - '''[[User talk:Rob T Firefly|Δ]][[Special:Contributions/Rob T Firefly|∇]]''' - 02:02, January 5, 2014 (UTC)  
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20140105020249-43908]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 23:32, 27 April 2023

The image upload page, Tardis:Image use policy, Help:Image cheat card, and other areas of the wiki stress the use of widescreen aspect rations on everything except video/book covers, where tall aspect ratio is unavoidable.

I'm wondering what folks here think of the rule's effect on actors' promotional headshots, which are traditionally made in portrait orientation. The headshots are often great for adding to actors' pages, but should they be cropped wide (which is not always actually possible to do while retaining the actor's features) or should an exception to the rule be made for them? — Rob T Firefly - Δ - 02:02, January 5, 2014 (UTC)