User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-5507557-20130411125020/@comment-188432-20130412140611: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Yeah, [[closed captioning]] is not part of the deal when you buy a programme. The re-broadcaster must pay for their own CC, which is why there's different closed captioning on iTunes, Sci-Fi and BBCA transmissions just within the US. | Yeah, [[closed captioning]] is not part of the deal when you buy a programme. The re-broadcaster must pay for their own CC, which is why there's different closed captioning on iTunes, Sci-Fi and BBCA transmissions just within the US. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
As for whether the presence of a species in the stadium indicates their geographic origin, this is not set in stone. I mean the point of the thread is is to hash it out. Why don't you think that's sufficient justification? | As for whether the presence of a species in the stadium indicates their geographic origin, this is not set in stone. I mean the point of the thread is is to hash it out. Why don't you think that's sufficient justification? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130411125020-5507557/20130412140611-188432]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:50, 27 April 2023
Yeah, closed captioning is not part of the deal when you buy a programme. The re-broadcaster must pay for their own CC, which is why there's different closed captioning on iTunes, Sci-Fi and BBCA transmissions just within the US.
Red Bee, btw, confirms Ultramancer (which I think is pretty clearly said by Smith anyway).
As for your image issues, we don't have a restriction against uploading pics solely for use in the forums. You can certainly upload for use here, as long as the pictures are otherwise T:GTI and T:ICC complaint (unless the point is to violate those rules in order to demonstrate them).
As for whether the presence of a species in the stadium indicates their geographic origin, this is not set in stone. I mean the point of the thread is is to hash it out. Why don't you think that's sufficient justification?
