Talk:The Megéve Experiment: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
(Correcting what appears to be a typo) Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So it seems to me that this is... A documentary about the making of a fan film? If that's the case, surely it doesn't pass rule 2? [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 18:00, 29 April 2023 (UTC) | So it seems to me that this is... A documentary about the making of a fan film? If that's the case, surely it doesn't pass rule 2? [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 18:00, 29 April 2023 (UTC) | ||
: Eh. Documentaries don't need licensing ''per se''. A reliable documentary about fanfilms of such obvious historical notability as ones where ''Who'' actors reprise their role could very well warrant a page. But I'm pretty confused about what this is exactly. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 18:15, 29 April 2023 (UTC) | : Eh. Documentaries don't need licensing ''per se''. A reliable documentary about fanfilms of such obvious historical notability as ones where ''Who'' actors reprise their role could very well warrant a page. But I'm pretty confused about what this is exactly. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 18:15, 29 April 2023 (UTC) | ||
:: The reason I mention Rule 2 is that someone has been adding this to [[Victoria Waterfield/Appearances]] and [[Ace/Appearances]], as if this page covers the fan film shown at the end. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 18:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
::: Ah. Yeah, shouldn't happen. (Hm. At least regarding Ace. Reeltime [[Downtime (home video)|did use Victoria under license once]]: could this be a NOTCOVERED candidate, usable at [[Victoria Waterfield/Appearances]]? We should investigate. But ''prima facie'' I agree it should be treated as fanfic until proven otherwise.) [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 18:21, 29 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
:::: That's a very good question. It really depends on if the BBC's permission for ''Downtime'' was a one-time thing or if it was more akin to the famous [[BBV]] "piece of paper", which gave permission for BBV to use [[Liz Shaw]] without a deadline. | |||
:::: Basically, it would be worth asking someone involved if they used Victoria under the belief that they had permission to. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 18:26, 29 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:30, 29 April 2023
So it seems to me that this is... A documentary about the making of a fan film? If that's the case, surely it doesn't pass rule 2? OS25🤙☎️ 18:00, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Eh. Documentaries don't need licensing per se. A reliable documentary about fanfilms of such obvious historical notability as ones where Who actors reprise their role could very well warrant a page. But I'm pretty confused about what this is exactly. Scrooge MacDuck ⊕ 18:15, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- The reason I mention Rule 2 is that someone has been adding this to Victoria Waterfield/Appearances and Ace/Appearances, as if this page covers the fan film shown at the end. OS25🤙☎️ 18:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Ah. Yeah, shouldn't happen. (Hm. At least regarding Ace. Reeltime did use Victoria under license once: could this be a NOTCOVERED candidate, usable at Victoria Waterfield/Appearances? We should investigate. But prima facie I agree it should be treated as fanfic until proven otherwise.) Scrooge MacDuck ⊕ 18:21, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
