Talk:Bi-generation: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with "==Bi-regeneration And The Watcher== Could this even mean that the existence of The Watcher was a bi-regeneration of sorts? In that the nascent Fifth Doctor co-existed with his predecessor, however temporarily?~~~~ :") Tags: 2017 source edit Disambiguation links |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Bi- | ==Bi-generation And The Watcher== | ||
Could this even mean that the existence of [[The Watcher]] was a bi- | Could this even mean that the existence of [[The Watcher (Logopolis)|The Watcher]] was a bi-generation of sorts? In that the nascent [[Fifth Doctor]] co-existed with [[Fourth Doctor|his predecessor]], however temporarily?<br/>-'''[[User:Mugenkagemaru|Mugen Kagemaru]]''' ([[User_talk:Mugenkagemaru|talk]]) 19:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
: | :Given that the Doctor knew about the Watcher and believed that bi-regeneration was a myth, no. [[User:Jack "BtR" Saxon|Jack "BtR" Saxon]] [[User talk:Jack "BtR" Saxon|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:58, 10 January 2024
Bi-generation And The Watcher[[edit source]]
Could this even mean that the existence of The Watcher was a bi-generation of sorts? In that the nascent Fifth Doctor co-existed with his predecessor, however temporarily?
-Mugen Kagemaru (talk) 19:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Given that the Doctor knew about the Watcher and believed that bi-regeneration was a myth, no. Jack "BtR" Saxon ☎ 19:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
