|
|
| (222 intermediate revisions by 87 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Talk Page}}
| |
| ==Episode Names.==
| |
| None of the names of the episodes have been revealed so they should be removed from the page until confirmation happens which will not be for a long time. Episode titles should be changed back to (TBA). [[Special:Contributions/92.6.80.22|92.6.80.22]] 10:21, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| :All titles, including that of the Christmas special will need to be removed. I have added a cleanup tag until this is done. '''[http://doctor-who-collectors.wikia.com/wiki/User:Tardis1963 <span style="background:#0E234E; color:white">Tardis1963</span>]''' 10:35, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
| | {{ArchCat}} |
| :Which it now has been. :) Woulda done it myself but don't have the time or patience. '''[http://doctor-who-collectors.wikia.com/wiki/User:Tardis1963 <span style="background:#0E234E; color:white">Tardis1963</span>]''' 10:43, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==2011 Christmas special== | | == image placement off<strike> |
| Don't jump the gun, folks. I just removed a comment "presuming a 2011 Christmas special". Aside from being waaaaay premature, if such a special is announced, it will be part of Series 7, just as the 2010 special was announced in the context of it being Series 6. If it's handled differently (as was Series 4 which actually saw two Christmas specials filmed during its production schedule) we'll know in due course. But the production of the 2010 special hasn't even begun yet. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 18:59, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
| | </strike> == |
| ==Karen Gillan== | |
| Though I can't see all of it due to subscription lock, this source claims she is back next series and it appears to be reputable.[http://www.broadcastnow.co.uk/news/broadcasters/bbc/matt-smith-confirmed-for-more-doctor-who/5011933.article]--[[User:Golden Monkey|Golden Monkey]] 19:48, March 20, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| | <strike>the images are overlapping the episode list. I don't know how to fix it and I don't want to make it worse. I just wanted to let someone who can fix it know.</strike>[[User:Tivis014|Tivis014]] <sup>[[User talk:Tivis014|talk to me]]</sup> 04:30, December 22, 2011 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| | | :It seems to be fixed now[[User:Tivis014|Tivis014]] <sup>[[User talk:Tivis014|talk to me]]</sup> 04:30, December 22, 2011 (UTC) |
| I folloed the source on the page, and it seems pretty vaige. Can anyone find a better one? Because I can't, and I beleive that without a reliable source we can't be completley sure that Amy will be returning. Hope so, though! : ) [[User:MidnightCat|MidnightCat]] 11:47, May 23, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| *When they confirmed Matt Smith returning at the press conference, they didn't confirm the return of Karen. My guess is that they were waiting to see how she faired with the audience. My guess is she will be back at some point. [[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 20:58, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == 2010 Christmas Special ==
| |
| | |
| Why is the information about the 2010 Christmas Special on this page. In the past the Christmas Specials have always been classed to the previous series. Therefore this needs to be removed and be placed on Series 5. -- [[User:Michael Downey|Michael Downey]] 21:38, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :Not sure I follow you, here. Christmas specials are the beginning of the new series. 2005 is the start of 2006 series; 2006 the beginning of the 2007 series, and so on, with the 2009 specials being a bit of an oddity. From a production standpoint, all but the 2008 special have been filmed after a hiatus, so they're clearly not a part of the previous series in terms of production. In terms of marketing, they've '''all''' been in the box set of the next year's stories. And it will be no different with the 2010 special. It's not going to be on the series 5 box set, which will clearly come out before the special is even made. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 01:19, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| If you wish to discuss this further, then please visit the 'series wars' thread on the forums.[[User:Dalekcaan14|Dalekcaan14]] 20:07, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :
| |
| | |
| ==Jonathan Ross==
| |
| There was an interview with Matt Smith on the Jonathan Ross show, and he revealed info about the series. I can't remember it though, so somebody'll have to look it up on BBC iPlayer, because Episode 6 was revealed. {{SUBST:User:Tigernose/sig}} 17:36, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == RTD to write for Series 6 ==
| |
| | |
| RTD will write an episode for this series - confirmed [http://www.southcom.com.au/~seymour/aprilfool/jester.gif here] [[Special:Contributions/188.221.79.22|188.221.79.22]] 10:14, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| That's called an April Fool. -- [[User:Dragonfree97|<span style="color:#006400;">Dragonfree</span>]] 19:53, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Thank heaven it ''is'' an April Fool. [[User:Bluebox444|Bluebox444]] 22:30, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == unconfirmed cast ==
| |
| | |
| If it's unconfirmed - why have it in the article? [[Special:Contributions/188.221.79.22|188.221.79.22]] 19:32, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Joanna Page has not been confirmed either - The reference won't load, but the original story was by a less-than-reputable tabloid newspaper 'The Daily Star'. Both Page and the BBC have since denied involvement. So she needs to be removed... and people should be more careful over the use of the word 'confirmed'[[Special:Contributions/86.184.48.234|86.184.48.234]] 01:32, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Series numbering ==
| |
| | |
| Moffat's made it very clear that this is not series 6, period. The internal production numbering will be "2". Maybe we should stick with "32".
| |
| | |
| [[Special:Contributions/67.241.25.16|67.241.25.16]] 02:09, April 18, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| The reason he made is clear that this isn't season 6 is because he was afraid of losing big name sponsors, who are usually put off by a season 6 kind of thing. Nobody's really sure how to refer to it yet. Or at least, BBC isn't. [[User:Musedae|Musedae]] 19:50, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Joanna Page ==
| |
| * The rumour had been removed by Mini-Mitch for no reason so I re-added. It has been confirmed by the Daily Star and I know they have had some un-true information in the past but they have also had some truths.(example of the titles for series 5 finale, months before the first title being confirmed) so it shall remain in the rumours page until properly confired or denied. -- [[User:Michael Downey|Michael Downey]] 18:56, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| ==Rory==
| |
| | |
| How do you know that it is likely Rory will return?
| |
| | |
| [[Special:Contributions/72.82.17.84|72.82.17.84]] 00:52, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ==Enemies==
| |
| Although no enemies have been confirmed, I'd love to see the return of Daleks, Weeping Angels, a Torchwood monster (like the Weevils) and a classic monster (like the Zygons) And since the Daleks have appeared in every other series, it is highly likely they will return. Also I'd like to see some new monsters (for at least 4 of the 10 stories)[[User:Fallen5|Fallen5]] 19:33, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :The Weeping Angels shouldn't return for at least another series. Anyway, this shouldn't be discussed here. Use the forums. {{User:Solar Dragon/Signature}} 19:45, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :
| |
| :
| |
| | |
| == Omega ==
| |
| | |
| Why do people keep insisting that Omega will return? I've seen the rumors, and that's all they are obviously, flying around all through the build-up for Season 5 and now, not 24 hours after the finale to Season 5 has aired, people are once again insisting that Omega will return in Season 6. '''Let us remember that Omega is a Time Lord and all the Time Lords are gone, except The Doctor'''. I know, I know...they brought back The Master (why wouldn't they? he's been a recurring ''Doctor Who'' foe for a long, long time) and, very briefly, Rassillon, but that was only for a two-part finale episode. Omega does not qualify as a major foe, and in all honesty doesn't deserve to come back (my opinion only). Let's stop the Omega rumors. [[User:ScoutDaddy70|ScoutDaddy70]] 15:00, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| *Omega could come back because he's in the antimatter universe, and may not have even partisipated in the Time war. He could be breaking through to this universe again and thats whats causing the cracks, it just a possibility. [[User:evilyoda|Evilyoda]] 19:28, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| *I understand all that, however, for it to be an actual "spoiler" it needs to be based somewhere, somehow, on some facts. Has there been discussion of Omega from Moffat? Have the actors let slip anything? Or is all this Omega talk just the talk of fans hoping it is Omega? That's what I mean. Are people just wishing or are there concrete facts to back up this rumor? [[User:ScoutDaddy70|ScoutDaddy70]] 11:59, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| There's no evidence in canon to support specifically the return of Omega whatsoever. It's just a rumour made up on the turd of a website that is Gallifrey Base with no evidence to support the assertion. It shouldn't appear in the article, or even the Big Bang one if we're to stay true to Wiki principles. [[User:Blightsoot|Blightsoot]] 12:16, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| I agree you shouldn't bring Omega back. He is an old series enemy, and Moffat is trying to create new enemies. The only old enemies he'll bring back are Daleks, Cybermen, maybe The Master and then only the old monsters that were in the alliance (though most of them may not return). Omega is unlikely to return.[[User:Fallen5|Fallen5]] 14:00, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| In one interview (I don't remember where) Moffat referred to the Silence as being plural. This would seem to discount that idea that Omega is the Silence. If Moffat ever did bring back a character like Omega, he would probably do it in the same way he handled the Dream Lord/Valeyard connections, with implied rather than explicit links to the actual character from classic Who. But I'm pretty sure the Silence is something entirely new. [[User:Bluebox444|Bluebox444]] 12:51, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Omega Returns , and questions from the ashes. ==
| |
| | |
| I agree. Yes Rasillon and The Master have both returned at least once (The Master 5 to 6 times) but Omega has absolutley no
| |
| reason to return. Unless at least one person that has anything to do with the making of Series 6 is in love with the episode
| |
| that has Omega in it (which I doubt and I havnt seen it so I cant really explain this too well so dont comment on this)
| |
| I believe that almost everyone that had something to do with the show all together has forgotten almost completeley about him,
| |
| sort of like with amy and rory before the season finale. What I want to know is how the doctor escapes, Amy comes back to life
| |
| , how rory regained control, and how the girl the doctor told to fly the TARDIS to his location (I cant remember her name)
| |
| survives the explosion, and my biggest question about series 6... How the tardis returns from the ashes of the explosion.
| |
| If anyone has any ideas on how or finds something that mentions something about any of these questions please dont hesitate
| |
| to post them.
| |
| | |
| ==Rumors section needs cleanup==
| |
| Since the article is semi-protected, could someone with access privileges please go through the Rumors section and repair the atrocious spelling and punctuation? Looks like a Judoon typed it up. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/68.146.81.123|68.146.81.123]] 03:43, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| *There's only one bit that needs cleaned up. The spelling is hardly atrocious, and we'd prefer it if you didn't call our regular users Judoon thank-you very much. [[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 10:09, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ==Myths printed in widely-read sources==
| |
| I noticed that some of the rumours which have been debunked have been removed. Of course we can't keep track of all the rumours and it makes sense to cull some of the ones that prove to be false. However, I wonder if there should be an exception for media with a large distribution - if only to record that a mistake was picked up by outside media and widely reported. For example, the rumour about Joanna Page appeared in the Daily Star, a printed newspaper which claims 1,701 million readers (is that comma for a decimal point? Is that common in the UK?) The rumour about Matt Smith leaving was also picked up by Virgin Media on their TV News web video, and I'm not sure where to stand on that one - although I think the rumour itself can probably be traced back to one blog. These rumours won't count as unsourced, as you can cite where they were found - but they're not true. Where do we stand on these? [[User:TheangelJean|the angel Jean - Smith's little elf]] 11:45, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
| |
