User talk:The Thirteenth Doctor: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
 
(146 intermediate revisions by 34 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--{| width="100%" style="background: #800080; "
| valign="top" width="50%" style="background:purple; border: 2px solid #800080; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|<h2></h2>-->
{{ArchCat}}


==Trenzalore==
Trenzalore was a place that, according to Dorium Maldovar, would be where the First Question in the Universe would be answered truthfully. The Doctor would arrive there at some point in his travels, at the fall of the Eleventh. The religious order known as the Silence was determined to ensure that the Doctor never reached Trenzalore. (DW: The Wedding of River Song) [1] History


Let's regress for a moment back to the Men in Black(MIB). According to John Keel, the MIB often state that they are representatives of the "Nation of the Third Eye."


{|align="right" style="text-align: center; border: solid 1px #CCC; margin: 20px; padding: 5px;"
  Based on some of the info already researched, it is
|<center>[[File:Archive filingcabinent.png|50px]]</center>
|-
|
'''Archives:''' [[User talk:The Thirteenth Doctor/Archive Talk|1]] | [[User talk:The Thirteenth Doctor/Archive Talk 2|2]]
|-
|__TOC__
|}


==Images==
apparent that Sirius has been in contact with humanity for a long time. According to George Hunt Williamson (one of the early contactees) in his book "Other Tongues, Other Flesh,"[2] the earth allies of Sirius, i.e., the secret societies, use the Eye of Horus as an insignia. This symbol has also been seen on the MIB. Secret societies believe that there is a Great White Lodge on earth. They call it Shamballa -- and consider it to be the spiritual center of the world. Now, theosophists such as Alice Bailey say that the Great White Lodge is on Sirius. If the All-Seeing-Eye is a symbol of Sirius' earth-allies and the MIB wear that symbol, and if Shamballa represents the Great White Lodge on earth -- then the MIB are emissaries of Shamballa. Sirius and Shamballa are two sides of the same coin. This is verified in the book "The Undiscovered Country,"[3] by Stephen Jenkins. Jenkins was told by Buddhist priests that Shamballa was located in the constellation of Orion.
One of the first things I usually do is check the [[Special:UncategorizedFiles]] page which is generally where a majority of images that new users upload end up (as regular editors tag images correctly). Thanks. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:28, August 24, 2010 (UTC)


== The War of Art ==
  The entrance to Shamballa on earth is usually placed in the
I deleted the section, as it is not in the Manual of style for the Prose layout. You best bet is to drag it up form the pages history and add what was there to the discontinuity page for it the the discontinuity section in the Howling, or add it to the talk page. It just keep all pages consistent and it look better if they are than having different section, (and in this case section in some pages and not in others). [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]] 21:04, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
:A section for it in the discontinuity section would be good, but it will take time as pages will need to be made for every book. It could be the case that it goes into the discontinuity section, and we make the pages for the books as we need them? [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]] 16:51, August 25, 2010 (UTC)


== Planet of the Spiders ==
trans-Himalayan region. Some assert it is in the heart of the Gobi Desert (where there have been allegations of crashed disks and bases). According to the explorer Nicholas Roerich, there are caves in the Himalayas foothills that have subterranean passages. In one of the these passages, there is a stone door that has never been opened, because the time for its opening has not yet arrived. In 1930, Doreal founded the Brotherhood of the White Temple. He says that the entrance to Shamballa is far underground. he goes on to say that space bends around Shamballa, and that there is a warp which leads into another universe.


Hi
--


I undid it because i was trying to find somwhere to watch it for ages and then i seen it on history so i undid and now i'm on part 2 where sarah-janes in the car with captian yates
== Thanks ==


see ya
Thanks for that and good luck with the answers site. :)--{{User:Skittles the hog/sig}} 17:50, September 4, 2011 (UTC)
:Ditto.  Oh, you may want to know that we've just this weekend updated our archiving templates.  So if you want to make them compatible with the archive tool you can find under this page's edit drop down, just replace all your architecture at the top of the page with the simple template {{tl|ArchCat}}.  ON your individual archives, you can replace what you have now with {{tl|ArchPage}}.  If you want :)  Note, however, that these templates will continue to be supported and upgraded in the future, whereas the ones you're currently using may be subject to deletion, as they're not compatible with the current automatic archiving system.  Anyway, thanks and good luck at DWA. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''18:22:59 Sun&nbsp;'''04 Sep 2011&nbsp;</span>


[[User:Lewody1|Lewody1]] 10:51 26 * 2010
== DW Answers wordmark ==


== Planet of the Spiders ==
I'm unable to leave a message on your user talk page at DW Answers because you have the page sysop locked, for some reason. I know that Answers sites take a lot of fly-by vandalism, but you might want to consider whether it's wise the lead admin to be unreachable by normal talk page communication.  But I digress. To celebrate the clean sweep you're proposing, I've dashed off a new wordmark for you that'll work better with really any background, but especially dark ones.  I created [http://drwho.answers.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:New_logo a forum post] about it and alerted your other bureaucrats to it.  If you don't like it, I certainly won't be offended if you don't use it.  But a transparent wordmark of ''some'' kind would probably be more flexible than the current, white-backgrounded design.


soz but i'm sure lots more people want to watch now its not on dvd
And, not that I'm one of your admins or anything, but your suggestion to just nuke the questions you have and start afresh is a '''fantastic''' idea.  However, it might be wise to spend the next week or so getting some policies in order.  Seriously, have you checked out BC's jaw-dropping revisions to the blocking policy?  You might want, also, to have some concrete guidelines for how you'd like questions asked and answered.  What format should the pages in your [[namespace]] 0 take?  Give some practical examples of good and bad ways to phrase questions.  Show people whether you want to separate individual answers with horizontal lines, indentation or headings.  Then, after you're sure you've explained the basics, drop the nuclear bomb and regenerate the site. In other words, '''absolutely''' get rid of those 5000+ pages, but have a clear set of guidelines for how the site is going to run.


Or at least, that's how ''I'd'' do it.  Your milage could indeed vary.  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''17:03:37 Tue&nbsp;'''06 Sep 2011&nbsp;</span>


== [[user:BroadcastCorp]] using sock puppets ==


see ya
You should read [[user talk:BroadcastCorp#You are infinitely banned]].  BC has been confirmed by Wikia to be using sock puppets.  Here, his sock is (at least) [[user:DomeSeven]].  We know he also has used an IP account on at least one occasion.  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''21:15:04 Mon&nbsp;'''12 Sep 2011&nbsp;</span>


{{Please see|Page Creation time}} [[User:Mini-mitch|MM]]/<small>[[User talk:Mini-mitch|Want to talk?]]</small> 22:27, October 1, 2011 (UTC)
{{Please see|Can we disable visual editor please?}} <br> {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}06:31: Wed&nbsp;21 Dec 2011&nbsp;</span>


==IP editors==
== Spoilers ==
Not really, a Wiki is built on all its editors, I can (and will) go through the Adventure Games articles and create-protect all articles that are red-linked which will prevent IP editors.
Well, this rule has been in place since 7 June 2010.  So I'm pretty sure you've been around since it's been in force.  It's explained pretty exhaustively at [[T:SPOIL]].  But the basic deal is that spoilers are only allowed on the series page and any thread in [[Howling:The Howling|The Howling]].  So, [[Series 7 (Doctor Who 2005)]] is the only place for what you put at ''[[Doctor Who]]'' — and I'm fairly sure the series 7 page already had that.


If you find any recently created articles that have been IP created that you believe are too badly written to make useful mark them for delete, they'll likely be deleted and then created at some later date by editors more fluent with the wiki and its use. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:46, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
Although you should read the whole of [[T:SPOIL]], you should probably pay special attention to [[T:SPOIL DEF]] [[T:OFFICIAL INFO]] and [[T:OFF REL]]. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}15:50: Mon&nbsp;30 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span>


== nothing ==
== Ban at DWA ==
Heya :)  Hate to be writing you with such unpleasantness at the holidays, but one of your new admin, [[user:Master of Spiders|Master of Spiders]] has rather randomly banned me at DWA, based upon the 2011 madness with [[user:BroadcastCorp|BroadcastCorp]].  Any chance you could pop back on DWA and unban me again?  Thanks :) {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 16:05: Thu 20 Dec 2012</span>
{{Christmas greetings}}


I took your advice, but its been roughly the equivilent of a month and still nothing, would youtell me what I'm doing wrong please. General MGD 109
How dare you call me vandalistic. I've done nothing of the sort. The last thing I did on here was Doctor Who-related and shouldn't have been deleted in the first place. Glad to see the deletion of the article was reversed.
 
== what the hel !! ==
 
 
== when you said do not remove other peoples text did you mean like you did to me ==
 
== Yes I have ==
 
Wait a minute, I have placed a copy in a form page in where you said, and I have asked what's wrong with it, but no one has given me a reply.
 
== Sarah Jane series 4 ==
 
Do you approve of my edit on the [[Series 4]] of the Sarah Jane Adventures page about the teaser clip?[[User:Ghastly9090|Ghastly9090]] 16:32, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
 
== Sorry- ==
 
What have I done this time?
 
 
~ThePandoricaOpens666 BST 22:09 5th September 2010
 
 
 
My edit to [[The Doctor]].
 
== The Nightmare Man ==
Hy I have something you might like hope you can find use for it [[File:Miscbooks-2389-med.jpg|thumb|100px]]
I apologize i just thought you could use it, because i'm no good a editing--[[User:Jackr12|Jackr12]] 16:13, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
Glad I could Help--[[User:Jackr12|Jackr12]] 16:18, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
 
==Torchwood wikia==
I've left a message for Trikster87 on their talk page over at the Torchwood Wikia with information about how to export/import. Some of the pages like [http://torchwoodbbc.wikia.com/wiki/Gwen_Cooper Gwen Cooper] have been blanked (though the page history remains). So we shall wait and see if they comply or not, if not we'll need to request the pages be removed by the wikia staff. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:02, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
 
:Hi, I'd like to thank you for going through and citing all the pages on the Torchwood Wiki that needed citing. We've both been unblocked from that Wiki so that's something. Again we'll have to wait and see. I hope the Trikster87 will the do the correct thing, though I'm not confident. Thanks. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:22, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 
== Infobox ==
 
Hi. How do you put stuff in a Infobox that has just been made? [[User:Ghastly9090|Ghastly9090]] 15:47, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
 
== The Dark Hoard ==
 
I am sorry I was completly unaware that I had deleted the preposed deletion I have not edited the site that often so am not aware of any of this.
 
== its not my personal thought! ==
 
its not my personal thuoughts is it though because she does die you watch forest of the dead again
 
 
oh yeah why do think waht i call editing is vandilsing you've said that alot
 
BYE
 
 
[[User:Lewody1]]
 
PS:A good idea of a wiki is wikisimpsons you could probaly learn alot from there its good because it can include characters lst look heres an example
 
== how is that true ==
 
how is that true because i remeber you created all series 5 episodes like 4 moths befire it came out cause i like to look at the history of them like 1 year before it came out with all those rumors that werent true
 
 
 
sorry i can't talk to you any more cause mr smith is on the 1 show
 
== Please Check With a Reliable Source Before Putting Down Assumptions ==
 
In one of your recent edits, you restored a production error in the episode Vincent and the Doctor regarding the usage of the term "solar system". However, the claim that there is only one solar system is largely unsupported by most academic sources. The term "solar system", though derived from Sol, does not necessarily imply the stellar system with the Sun. In World Book at NASA, the term is used to describe any stellar system (http://www.nasa.gov/worldbook/solarsystem_worldbook_update.html). This practice is largely adopted by many academic researchers, e.g. Artymowicz's article "Beta Pictoris and Other Solar Systems" in the ''Space Science Reviews'', Boss' "[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998lerf.book.....B Looking for earths : the race to find new solar systems]", Taber's "[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1965QB54.O7........ Life in other solar systems]", Wilbur K. Brown's "Possible mass distributions in the nebulae of other solar systems" from ''Earth, Moon, and Planets'' Volume 37, Number 3. I am quite perplexed as to why you would make such an assumption only based on the etymology of the term. I am certain that some people may choose to use the term to describe exclusively the Solar System, but to claim that using the term "solar system" in way consistent with academic and technical usage as an production error based on your personal belief is largely unjustified, please avoid similar edits. --[[Special:Contributions/222.166.181.131|222.166.181.131]] 19:23, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
 
 
 
Please do not make edits on subjects in which you don't understand. The term "solar system" has always been used in the sense of describing any stellar system. The terms "planetary system" and "stellar system" used in this sense are quite recent inventions to avoid the ambiguity posed by the word "solar". It would be most inaccurate to say that "solar system" is a colloquial way of referring to a stellar system. Your respond on the talk page of Vincent and the Doctor suggests that you checked with Wikipedia because you are not knowledgeable in the subject. After a brief glimpse, I find the article you refered to as "solar system" is an entry on "the Solar System"; the source in the footnote for the definition of "solar system" on that specific wikipedia article is [http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/solar%20system ''Merriam-Webster's 11th Collegiate Dictionary''], which if you click on it, will direct you to a page that says:
: solar system
 
: noun
: Definition of SOLAR SYSTEM
 
: : the sun together with the group of celestial bodies that are held by its attraction and revolve around it; also : a similar system centered on another star
 
The article makes itself quite clear that it's referring to the Solar System. I am quite confused as to why you would edit something when you acknowledge that you really know what it is. When you make any edit, please make sure you have a clear understanding of the subject concerned and the edit would not be based on anecdotal knowledge or assumptions. Thank you.--[[Special:Contributions/203.168.176.42|203.168.176.42]] 23:08, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
==information before "unstubbing"==
Hi Thirteenth Doctor you seem reliable so im going to ask how much information is needed before the stub is gone. Please tell me and do NOT chastise me for asking a stupid question. [[User:DalekVictor554|DalekVictor554]] 07:58, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
 
howd u find that out
 
== =) ==
 
You've been busy haven't you?
 
 
 
==Reply==
 
Sorry then, I did it by accident, I thought I was on your talk page, dont know what went wrong. Come on, do your really want articles to look dull? Images add colour to the article and capture peoples attention.
 
==User pages and redlinks==
I've made an edit to the user's user page by adding <nowiki><nowiki></nowiki></nowiki> tags around all of the templates it preserves the page's layout for the most part while preventing the templates from becoming templates.
 
If you find any others like this you can do as I've done, but given the level of change to the user's user page leave a note indicating what you've done and why you've done it. Thanks. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 18:16, September 13, 2010 (UTC)
 
==Questions and Comments==
Honestly some of the people on here, everything has to be done to an exact way, you lot are like Terminators or Cybermen or Daleks.
 
 
 
If editing someones user page is considered vandalism how comes you can edit their page in the first place?
 
 
Completely devoid of emotion or desire. Ive added the pictures again but THIS TIME ive added better detail and I think now they add stuff to the article. Is this OK?
 
 
 
Well. Seems OK I suppost, I did'nt mean to offend anyone, but sometimes it does seem like this wiki is run by people who dont even like Doctor Who, you and other users seem to be, not saying this is true but, you all seem to be like machines, who need Doctor Who as fuel, and your mission is to create a detailed encyclopedia of it and making it as boring and uninteresting as possibly, as well as picking on users you dont like. But you're probably not like that at all so I wont say it again.

Latest revision as of 19:59, 25 April 2024

Archive.png
Archives: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5

Trenzalore[[edit]]

Trenzalore was a place that, according to Dorium Maldovar, would be where the First Question in the Universe would be answered truthfully. The Doctor would arrive there at some point in his travels, at the fall of the Eleventh. The religious order known as the Silence was determined to ensure that the Doctor never reached Trenzalore. (DW: The Wedding of River Song) [1] History

Let's regress for a moment back to the Men in Black(MIB). According to John Keel, the MIB often state that they are representatives of the "Nation of the Third Eye."

  Based on some of the info already researched, it is

apparent that Sirius has been in contact with humanity for a long time. According to George Hunt Williamson (one of the early contactees) in his book "Other Tongues, Other Flesh,"[2] the earth allies of Sirius, i.e., the secret societies, use the Eye of Horus as an insignia. This symbol has also been seen on the MIB. Secret societies believe that there is a Great White Lodge on earth. They call it Shamballa -- and consider it to be the spiritual center of the world. Now, theosophists such as Alice Bailey say that the Great White Lodge is on Sirius. If the All-Seeing-Eye is a symbol of Sirius' earth-allies and the MIB wear that symbol, and if Shamballa represents the Great White Lodge on earth -- then the MIB are emissaries of Shamballa. Sirius and Shamballa are two sides of the same coin. This is verified in the book "The Undiscovered Country,"[3] by Stephen Jenkins. Jenkins was told by Buddhist priests that Shamballa was located in the constellation of Orion.

  The entrance to Shamballa on earth is usually placed in the

trans-Himalayan region. Some assert it is in the heart of the Gobi Desert (where there have been allegations of crashed disks and bases). According to the explorer Nicholas Roerich, there are caves in the Himalayas foothills that have subterranean passages. In one of the these passages, there is a stone door that has never been opened, because the time for its opening has not yet arrived. In 1930, Doreal founded the Brotherhood of the White Temple. He says that the entrance to Shamballa is far underground. he goes on to say that space bends around Shamballa, and that there is a warp which leads into another universe.

--

Thanks[[edit]]

Thanks for that and good luck with the answers site. :)--Skittles the hog - talk 17:50, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

Ditto. Oh, you may want to know that we've just this weekend updated our archiving templates. So if you want to make them compatible with the archive tool you can find under this page's edit drop down, just replace all your architecture at the top of the page with the simple template {{ArchCat}}. ON your individual archives, you can replace what you have now with {{ArchPage}}. If you want :) Note, however, that these templates will continue to be supported and upgraded in the future, whereas the ones you're currently using may be subject to deletion, as they're not compatible with the current automatic archiving system. Anyway, thanks and good luck at DWA.
czechout<staff />   18:22:59 Sun 04 Sep 2011 

DW Answers wordmark[[edit]]

I'm unable to leave a message on your user talk page at DW Answers because you have the page sysop locked, for some reason. I know that Answers sites take a lot of fly-by vandalism, but you might want to consider whether it's wise the lead admin to be unreachable by normal talk page communication. But I digress. To celebrate the clean sweep you're proposing, I've dashed off a new wordmark for you that'll work better with really any background, but especially dark ones. I created a forum post about it and alerted your other bureaucrats to it. If you don't like it, I certainly won't be offended if you don't use it. But a transparent wordmark of some kind would probably be more flexible than the current, white-backgrounded design.

And, not that I'm one of your admins or anything, but your suggestion to just nuke the questions you have and start afresh is a fantastic idea. However, it might be wise to spend the next week or so getting some policies in order. Seriously, have you checked out BC's jaw-dropping revisions to the blocking policy? You might want, also, to have some concrete guidelines for how you'd like questions asked and answered. What format should the pages in your namespace 0 take? Give some practical examples of good and bad ways to phrase questions. Show people whether you want to separate individual answers with horizontal lines, indentation or headings. Then, after you're sure you've explained the basics, drop the nuclear bomb and regenerate the site. In other words, absolutely get rid of those 5000+ pages, but have a clear set of guidelines for how the site is going to run.

Or at least, that's how I'd do it. Your milage could indeed vary.
czechout<staff />   17:03:37 Tue 06 Sep 2011 

user:BroadcastCorp using sock puppets[[edit]]

You should read user talk:BroadcastCorp#You are infinitely banned. BC has been confirmed by Wikia to be using sock puppets. Here, his sock is (at least) user:DomeSeven. We know he also has used an IP account on at least one occasion.
czechout<staff />   21:15:04 Mon 12 Sep 2011 

Your input is needed!

You are invited to join the discussion at Forum:Page Creation time. MM/Want to talk? 22:27, October 1, 2011 (UTC)

Your input is needed!

You are invited to join the discussion at Forum:Can we disable visual editor please?.

czechout<staff />   06:31: Wed 21 Dec 2011 

Spoilers[[edit]]

Well, this rule has been in place since 7 June 2010. So I'm pretty sure you've been around since it's been in force. It's explained pretty exhaustively at T:SPOIL. But the basic deal is that spoilers are only allowed on the series page and any thread in The Howling. So, Series 7 (Doctor Who 2005) is the only place for what you put at Doctor Who — and I'm fairly sure the series 7 page already had that.

Although you should read the whole of T:SPOIL, you should probably pay special attention to T:SPOIL DEF T:OFFICIAL INFO and T:OFF REL.
czechout<staff />   15:50: Mon 30 Apr 2012 

Ban at DWA[[edit]]

Heya :) Hate to be writing you with such unpleasantness at the holidays, but one of your new admin, Master of Spiders has rather randomly banned me at DWA, based upon the 2011 madness with BroadcastCorp. Any chance you could pop back on DWA and unban me again? Thanks :)
czechout<staff />    16:05: Thu 20 Dec 2012

Christmas cheer[[edit]]

Happy holidays!

As this fiftieth anniversary year comes to a close, we here at Tardis just want to thank you for being a part of our community — even if you haven't edited here in a while. If you have edited with us this year, then thanks for all your hard work.

This year has seen an impressive amount of growth. We've added about 11,000 pages this year, which is frankly incredible for a wiki this big. November was predictably one of the busiest months we've ever had: over 500 unique editors pitched in. It was the highest number of editors in wiki history for a year in which only one programme in the DWU was active. And our viewing stats have been through the roof. We've averaged well over 2 million page views each week for the last two months, with some weeks seeing over 4 million views!

We've received an unprecedented level of support from Wikia Staff, resulting in all sorts of new goodies and productive new relationships. And we've recently decided to lift almost every block we've ever made so as to allow most everyone a second chance to be part of our community.

2014 promises to build on this year's foundations, especially since we've got a full, unbroken series coming up — something that hasn't happened since 2011. We hope you'll stick with us — or return to the Tardis — so that you can be a part of the fun!

TardisDataCoreRoadway.png


How dare you call me vandalistic. I've done nothing of the sort. The last thing I did on here was Doctor Who-related and shouldn't have been deleted in the first place. Glad to see the deletion of the article was reversed.