Talk:Smith and Jones (TV story): Difference between revisions
(→Stethoscope scene: new section) |
m (this bot script identified more false positives than actual dead links so I'm reverting all of its talk page edits) Tag: Manual revert |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
One thing I keep finding myself wondering about: | One thing I keep finding myself wondering about: | ||
How did Martha know to check both sides of the Doctor's chest for heartbeats? [[User:ProtoKun7|ProtoKun7]] 01:03, November 1, 2010 (UTC) | How did Martha know to check both sides of the Doctor's chest for heartbeats? Unless she was only using the stethoscope to check for any abnormalities and came across the second unintentionally (which then raises into question the next line). [[User:ProtoKun7|ProtoKun7]] 01:03, November 1, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:20, 25 April 2023
Possible Reference to DooM?[[edit source]]
After watching episode The Impossible Planet I began looking out for DooM references inside Doctor Who. While watching "Smith and Jones" I noticed something odd.
This is a screen cap of the Plasmavore operating the MRI instrumentation:
http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/3741/drwho03x01smithandjones.jpg
The letters on the instrument (left of the Plasmavore's hand) spell out UAC and the symbol representing the "A" closely resembles the UAC symbol! Seems too much to be a coincidence. --ZCochrane 18:02, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Page editing[[edit source]]
At the bottom of the continuity section there is a mis-placed and mis-parameted [?] contribution which belongs in the plot hole section. Although I would be able to cut and paste the comment into it's proper place I cannot figure out how to remove the original post as it does not appear on the editing page. Can anyone fix this?
Stethoscope scene[[edit source]]
One thing I keep finding myself wondering about:
How did Martha know to check both sides of the Doctor's chest for heartbeats? Unless she was only using the stethoscope to check for any abnormalities and came across the second unintentionally (which then raises into question the next line). ProtoKun7 01:03, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
