Doctor-lite: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (Upholding T:APOS)
 
(136 intermediate revisions by 47 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{real world}}
{{real world}}
'''Doctor-lite''' or '''companion-lite''' is a classification given to stories in which [[the Doctor]] and/or his [[companion]]s are deliberately de-emphasised in the narrative. Though most commonly associated with the production necessities of the [[BBC Wales]] version of the programme, there have been non-televised stories which have elected to tell Doctor-lite stories purely for dramatic purposes.
'''"Doctor-lite"''' is a term originated by the [[BBC Wales]] ''[[Doctor Who]]'' production team to describe televised episodes which, in order to be able to film all commissioned episodes in time and on budget, don't have an extensive appearance by [[the Doctor]]. Inversely, "companion-lite" describes an episode that, for similar reasons, has a reduced appearance by the regular [[companion]](s).


==Usage in ''Doctor Who''==
== Etymology ==
Doctor-lite episodes are not usually considered to be parts of [[serial]]s of the 1963 version in which the Doctor or his companions do not appear. This often happened in the [[1960s]] as a way to give an actor a week off. Nor are they stories in which are set in the [[Whoniverse]], but not released as a ''[[Doctor Who]]'' story, such as ''[[Torchwood]]'', the [[Doctor Who Magazine back-up comics stories|''Doctor Who Magazine'' back-up comics]], or any of a number of [[Big Finish Productions]] ranges. Rather, they are entire ''stories'' in which the Doctor makes only a brief or incidental appearance — or at least is implied to be in the TARDIS. Companion-lite stories are likewise not those in which the Doctor is traveling entirely without a companion. Rather, they are ones in which a companion is established as being an ongoing resident of [[the Doctor's TARDIS]], but sidelined from the main action of a story.
One of the earliest known uses of the term was in 2007, when [[Steven Moffat]] called ''[[Blink (TV story)|Blink]]'' "the cheap, no CGI, Doctor-lite episode" of [[series 3 (Doctor Who 2005)|series 3]] in [[DWM 393|''Doctor Who Magazine'' #393]]. ''[[DWM]]'' staff writer [[David Darlington]], who was conducting an interview with Moffat in that issue, picked up on this "behind-the-scenes" meaning of the word, and called ''Blink'' the "[[double-banking]] episode", which Moffat confirmed meant "the one that doesn't have the Doctor in". ''DWM'' subsequently reprinted Moffat in [[DWMSE 17|''DWMSE'' #17]]'s exploration of the making of ''Blink''. Later, while he was in production of [[series 5 (Doctor Who 2005)|series 5]], Moffat gave an interview to ''Non-Sports Update'' in which he said that Doctor-lite episodes are "purely a scheduling issue", arising out of a need to film fourteen episodes in the time necessary to film thirteen, meaning that there's "one without the Doctor" filmed simultaneously with another episode that does feature the Doctor.<ref>[http://www.nsu-magazine.com/doctor-lite/ Biegel, Alan. "Doctor-Lite". ''Non-Sport Update''. 27 August 2011.]</ref> So to the production team, it's not ''just'' a story that doesn't feature the Doctor much. It's a story that doesn't feature the Doctor because there's no other way that [[principal photography]] could be concluded in the time allotted. This basis had already led to the creation of the episode ''[[Father's Day (TV story)|Father's Day]]'' in [[Series 1 (Doctor Who 2005)|series 1]] and ''[[Love & Monsters (TV story)|Love & Monsters]]'' in [[Series 2 (Doctor Who 2005)|series 2]].


The term came into vogue with the broadcast of ''[[Love & Monsters]]'', the first intentionally Doctor-lite episode of the televised programme. ''Monsters'' was followed by ''[[Blink]]'' and ''[[Turn Left]]'', and the companion-lite episodes; ''[[Midnight (TV story)|Midnight]]'' and ''[[The Lodger (TV story)|The Lodger]]''. All of these were deliberately written so as to allow for [[double banking]], a process which enables two separate stories to be recorded simultaneously because of the reduced need for the main cast. Both [[Series 1 (Doctor Who)|Series 1]] and [[Series 5 (Doctor Who)|Series 5]] of the revived series did not feature a Doctor-lite episode, as the previous Christmas did not show a special episode starring their respective Doctor's as the main Doctor.
The next was 2008's ''[[Turn Left (TV story)|Turn Left]]'', starring [[Donna Noble]] as main character of the episode. That was counter-balanced by the previous ''[[Midnight (TV story)|Midnight]]'', which brought an innovation: it was ''only'' companion-lite, since [[David Tennant]] was fully engaged in that story. [[Series 4 (Doctor Who 2005)|Series 4]]'s introduction of the companion-lite story was followed in the next two series by the two [[Craig Owens]] adventures, ''[[The Lodger (TV story)|The Lodger]]'' and ''[[Closing Time (TV story)|Closing Time]]''. Though these stories absolutely featured less of the regular companions for production reasons, the fact that they starred a recurring character offered a further refinement of the concept. It allowed fans to view the episodes as "companion-different" rather than companion-lite.


Though the term may have been a product of the BBC Wales version of the television programme, the concept certainly pre-dates the 2005 series. Two prose examples of Doctor-lite stories are the novels, ''[[Who Killed Kennedy]]'' and ''[[The Face of the Enemy]]''. In comics, the earliest Doctor-lite story is likely "[[K-9's Finest Hour]]", in which the [[Fourth Doctor|Doctor]] is characterized as being asleep until the final frames of the narrative. "[[Happy Deathday]]", too, is ultimately revealed to be a Doctor-lite story, in which [[Eighth Doctor|the Doctor]] is never actually seen, but the entirety of the story is revealed to be something that happened on a videogame [[Izzy Sinclair|Izzy]] was playing on the TARDIS' [[Time-Space Visualiser]].
In 2022, [[Christopher Eccleston]] called 2005's ''[[Father's Day (TV story)|Father's Day]]'' a "Doctor-lite" episode, dating the concept back to the beginning of the reboot in 2005.<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOSsYljRi58 Christopher Eccleston {{!}} His favorite Dr Who episode. ''FAN EXPO HQ''. 31 May 2022.]</ref>


Companion-lite stories are comparatively rarer in other media, but there's at least one example that, however narrowly, predates [[Midnight (TV story)|the introduction of the concept to television]]. The comic strip, "[[The Lodger (comic story)|The Lodger]]", gave readers a [[Rose Tyler|Rose]]-lite, [[Mickey Smith|Mickey]]-heavy story at a time well before Mickey joined the TARDIS crew in ''[[School Reunion]]''.
Indeed fan use of the term is important to document, if only to contrast with the original [[BBC Wales]] meaning. To many fans, a Doctor- or companion-lite story is simply any adventure where the role of the Doctor and/or recurring companion is significantly reduced. Thus, fans will often make a retrospective judgement about an old [[serial]], calling them "Doctor-lite" — even when there is no evidence at all of a behind-the-scenes ''need'' for a Doctor-lite story.


==Usage in spin-off shows==
This purely narrative assessment is also used with non-televised stories, and indeed there are several examples of this sort of "audience perception" Doctor-lite story going back as far as the old [[World Distributors]] [[Doctor Who annual|annuals]]. In this sense, companion-lite stories have happened since at least the [[First Doctor comic stories]] in ''[[TV Comic]]'', where [[John Who|John]] and [[Gillian Who|Gillian]] sometimes disappeared for weeks.
''[[Torchwood]]'' followed this model in its episode ''[[Random Shoes]]'' (series 1), portraying the main cast only through those glimpses seen by [[Eugene Jones]]. It does not reattempt this formula in later series.


''[[The Sarah Jane Adventures]]'' uses this model in ''[[Whatever Happened to Sarah Jane?]]'' (series 1), ''[[The Mark of the Berserker]]'' (series 2), ''[[Mona Lisa's Revenge]]'' (series 3) and ''[[The Empty Planet]]'' (series 4).
== Non-televised stories ==
Though the ''term'' may have been a product of the BBC Wales version of the television programme, the ''concept'' of a story featuring less of the Doctor certainly predates the 2005 series. Three prose examples of Doctor-lite stories are the novels ''[[Who Killed Kennedy (novel)|Who Killed Kennedy]]'', ''[[Birthright (novel)|Birthright]]'' and ''[[The Face of the Enemy]]''. In comics, ''[[Happy Deathday (comic story)|Happy Deathday]]'' is ultimately revealed to be a Doctor-lite story, in which the [[Eighth Doctor]] is never actually seen, but the entirety of the story is revealed to be something that happened on a video game [[Izzy Sinclair|Izzy]] was playing on the TARDIS's [[Time-Space Visualiser]].
 
[[PROSE]]: ''[[The Banquo Legacy]]'' was a Doctor-lite, with supporting characters centred by their retelling of the narrative. Equally, the two short stories ''[[Amy's Escapade (short story)|Amy's Escapade]]'' and ''[[Rory's Adventure (short story)|Rory's Adventure]]'' in ''[[Doctor Who The Official Annual 2012]]'' are Doctor-lite stories starring each companion, set simultaneously.
 
There are fewer examples of companion-lite stories in other media, within the TV series ''[[Midnight (TV story)|Midnight]]'' narrowly predates the concept. The comic story ''[[The Lodger (comic story)|The Lodger]]'' gave readers a [[Rose Tyler|Rose]]-lite, [[Mickey Smith|Mickey]]-heavy story at a time well before Mickey joined the TARDIS crew in [[TV]]: ''[[School Reunion (TV story)|School Reunion]]''.
 
Historically, though, the earliest companion-lite stories can be found in [[World Distributors]] [[Doctor Who annual|annuals]] and ''[[TV Comic]]''. Annual short stories like ''[[Fungus (short story)|Fungus]]'' and others featured a Doctor whose companion-less status — even though companions were present elsewhere in the annual — was never explained.
 
Any number of [[Polystyle]]'s comic stories suddenly had a regular character drop out of sight without explanation. But stories like ''[[The Duellists (comic story)|The Duellists]]'', where [[Jamie McCrimmon]] is suddenly absent after having been in the comic for dozens of weeks, is perhaps not the purest application of the term "companion-lite". This sort of turnover happens with regularity in comics. One issue [[Destrii]] and [[Ace]] were in [[DWM comic stories|''DWM'' comic stories]], and the next they weren't.
 
However, there are examples that are less ambiguous.
* Several [[First Doctor|First]] and [[Second Doctor]] strips scantly feature [[John Who|John]] and [[Gillian Who|Gillian]]. One example is ''[[The Hunters of Zerox (comic story)|The Hunters of Zerox]]'', in which they don't really show up until the very end. Another is ''[[The Extortioner (comic story)|The Extortioner]]'', where he just leaves them in [[the TARDIS]] altogether, like [[Nyssa]] in ''[[Kinda (TV story)|Kinda]]''.
* ''[[Double Trouble (comic story)|Double Trouble]]'' was a [[Sarah-Jane Smith]]-less [[Fourth Doctor]] story in the middle of two stories that ''did'' feature her.
 
== Fan co-option ==
There is little doubt that since the term was first used in the 2000s, fans have sought to use the term to describe stories that had narratives with "less of the Doctor". Among the many stories claimed to be "Doctor-lite" by fans — without any reference to production realities — are ''[[The Tenth Planet (TV story)|The Tenth Planet]]'',<ref>[http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1548751 A digitalspy.co.uk forum discussion] about ''[[The Tenth Planet (TV story)|The Tenth Planet]]'' as a possible Doctor-lite</ref> ''[[The Crimson Horror (TV story)|The Crimson Horror]]'',<ref>[http://nostalgiafilter.blogspot.com/2013/05/review-doctor-who-711-crimson-horror.html "Review: Doctor Who 7.11: The Crimson Horror". nostalgiafilter.blogspot.com. 4 May 2013], a fan review asserting ''[[The Crimson Horror (TV story)|The Crimson Horror]]'' as "Doctor-lite"</ref><ref>[http://hotcutegirlygeek.wordpress.com/category/doctor-who/ A hotcutegirlygeek.wordpress.com review of ''Crimson Horror''], making the same assertion</ref> ''[[The Veiled Leopard (audio story)|The Veiled Leopard]]'', <ref>[http://www.wrongplanet.net/postx220222-15-0.html A wrong planet.net forum discussion] asserting that [[AUDIO]]: ''[[The Veiled Leopard (audio story)|The Veiled Leopard]]'' is a Doctor-lite story.</ref> part one of ''[[Spearhead from Space (TV story)|Spearhead from Space]]''<ref>[http://edwardianadventurer.wordpress.com/2012/05/15/doctor-who-story-051-spearhead-from-space-part-1/ A 2012 ewardianadventurer.wordpress.com article] which claims ''[[Spearhead from Space (TV story)|Spearhead from Space]]'', part 1, is "a Doctor-lite story"</ref> and ''[[The Massacre (TV story)|The Massacre]]''.<ref>[http://forums.syfy.com/index.php?showtopic=2362225&p=7057237 A February 2013 post at the SyFy forums]</ref>
 
== Usage on this wiki ==
Because the term has demonstrable flexibility within fandom, it's important to have a clear sense of what the term does ''not'' mean to this wiki, editorially.
* For televised episodes, we stick with the strict definition provided by [[Steven Moffat]]: it's only Doctor-lite if it's made by BBC Wales and features less of the Doctor because of [[double-banking]].
* They aren't stories which were filmed when there was no actor under contract to play an ongoing companion. Hence, ''[[The Lodger (TV story)|The Lodger]]'' is companion-lite, but ''[[The Waters of Mars (TV story)|The Waters of Mars]]'' isn't.
* They aren't stories in which only some of the companions make a reduced appearance. ''[[Vincent and the Doctor (TV story)|Vincent and the Doctor]]'' might very well be "[[Rory Williams|Rory]]-lite", but it's not companion-lite as [[Amy Pond|Amy]] makes a full appearance. In addition, Rory had ceased to exist at the end of ''[[Cold Blood (TV story)|Cold Blood]]'', making the hypothetical "Rory-lite" term inaccurate as he was not an ongoing companion.
* They aren't stories in which a character has a reduced appearance in a single episode of a multi-part story. In the Hartnell and Troughton eras, several individual episodes had a reduced role for their companions as a result of the filming schedule of the time and the serialised nature of the programme.
* ''[[Torchwood (TV series)|Torchwood]]'', ''[[The Sarah Jane Adventures]]'', [[DWM backup comic stories|''Doctor Who Magazine'' backup comics]], or any of a number of [[Big Finish Productions]] ranges aren't Doctor-lite — they're spin-offs. Spinoff stories can be "character-lite" themselves, such as ''[[Whatever Happened to Sarah Jane? (TV story)|Whatever Happened to Sarah Jane?]]'', but this is stretching an already thin term.
 
== Footnotes ==
{{reflist|2}}


==Behind the scenes==
[[Russell T Davies]] based ''[[Love & Monsters]]'' on the ''[[c:Buffy:Buffy the Vampire Slayer|Buffy the Vampire Slayer]]'' episode ''[[c:Buffy:The Zeppo|The Zeppo]]''.
[[Category:Terminology]]
[[Category:Terminology]]
[[Category:Fan terminology]]

Latest revision as of 18:18, 3 November 2024

RealWorld.png

"Doctor-lite" is a term originated by the BBC Wales Doctor Who production team to describe televised episodes which, in order to be able to film all commissioned episodes in time and on budget, don't have an extensive appearance by the Doctor. Inversely, "companion-lite" describes an episode that, for similar reasons, has a reduced appearance by the regular companion(s).

Etymology[[edit] | [edit source]]

One of the earliest known uses of the term was in 2007, when Steven Moffat called Blink "the cheap, no CGI, Doctor-lite episode" of series 3 in Doctor Who Magazine #393. DWM staff writer David Darlington, who was conducting an interview with Moffat in that issue, picked up on this "behind-the-scenes" meaning of the word, and called Blink the "double-banking episode", which Moffat confirmed meant "the one that doesn't have the Doctor in". DWM subsequently reprinted Moffat in DWMSE #17's exploration of the making of Blink. Later, while he was in production of series 5, Moffat gave an interview to Non-Sports Update in which he said that Doctor-lite episodes are "purely a scheduling issue", arising out of a need to film fourteen episodes in the time necessary to film thirteen, meaning that there's "one without the Doctor" filmed simultaneously with another episode that does feature the Doctor.[1] So to the production team, it's not just a story that doesn't feature the Doctor much. It's a story that doesn't feature the Doctor because there's no other way that principal photography could be concluded in the time allotted. This basis had already led to the creation of the episode Father's Day in series 1 and Love & Monsters in series 2.

The next was 2008's Turn Left, starring Donna Noble as main character of the episode. That was counter-balanced by the previous Midnight, which brought an innovation: it was only companion-lite, since David Tennant was fully engaged in that story. Series 4's introduction of the companion-lite story was followed in the next two series by the two Craig Owens adventures, The Lodger and Closing Time. Though these stories absolutely featured less of the regular companions for production reasons, the fact that they starred a recurring character offered a further refinement of the concept. It allowed fans to view the episodes as "companion-different" rather than companion-lite.

In 2022, Christopher Eccleston called 2005's Father's Day a "Doctor-lite" episode, dating the concept back to the beginning of the reboot in 2005.[2]

Indeed fan use of the term is important to document, if only to contrast with the original BBC Wales meaning. To many fans, a Doctor- or companion-lite story is simply any adventure where the role of the Doctor and/or recurring companion is significantly reduced. Thus, fans will often make a retrospective judgement about an old serial, calling them "Doctor-lite" — even when there is no evidence at all of a behind-the-scenes need for a Doctor-lite story.

This purely narrative assessment is also used with non-televised stories, and indeed there are several examples of this sort of "audience perception" Doctor-lite story going back as far as the old World Distributors annuals. In this sense, companion-lite stories have happened since at least the First Doctor comic stories in TV Comic, where John and Gillian sometimes disappeared for weeks.

Non-televised stories[[edit] | [edit source]]

Though the term may have been a product of the BBC Wales version of the television programme, the concept of a story featuring less of the Doctor certainly predates the 2005 series. Three prose examples of Doctor-lite stories are the novels Who Killed Kennedy, Birthright and The Face of the Enemy. In comics, Happy Deathday is ultimately revealed to be a Doctor-lite story, in which the Eighth Doctor is never actually seen, but the entirety of the story is revealed to be something that happened on a video game Izzy was playing on the TARDIS's Time-Space Visualiser.

PROSE: The Banquo Legacy was a Doctor-lite, with supporting characters centred by their retelling of the narrative. Equally, the two short stories Amy's Escapade and Rory's Adventure in Doctor Who The Official Annual 2012 are Doctor-lite stories starring each companion, set simultaneously.

There are fewer examples of companion-lite stories in other media, within the TV series Midnight narrowly predates the concept. The comic story The Lodger gave readers a Rose-lite, Mickey-heavy story at a time well before Mickey joined the TARDIS crew in TV: School Reunion.

Historically, though, the earliest companion-lite stories can be found in World Distributors annuals and TV Comic. Annual short stories like Fungus and others featured a Doctor whose companion-less status — even though companions were present elsewhere in the annual — was never explained.

Any number of Polystyle's comic stories suddenly had a regular character drop out of sight without explanation. But stories like The Duellists, where Jamie McCrimmon is suddenly absent after having been in the comic for dozens of weeks, is perhaps not the purest application of the term "companion-lite". This sort of turnover happens with regularity in comics. One issue Destrii and Ace were in DWM comic stories, and the next they weren't.

However, there are examples that are less ambiguous.

Fan co-option[[edit] | [edit source]]

There is little doubt that since the term was first used in the 2000s, fans have sought to use the term to describe stories that had narratives with "less of the Doctor". Among the many stories claimed to be "Doctor-lite" by fans — without any reference to production realities — are The Tenth Planet,[3] The Crimson Horror,[4][5] The Veiled Leopard, [6] part one of Spearhead from Space[7] and The Massacre.[8]

Usage on this wiki[[edit] | [edit source]]

Because the term has demonstrable flexibility within fandom, it's important to have a clear sense of what the term does not mean to this wiki, editorially.

  • For televised episodes, we stick with the strict definition provided by Steven Moffat: it's only Doctor-lite if it's made by BBC Wales and features less of the Doctor because of double-banking.
  • They aren't stories which were filmed when there was no actor under contract to play an ongoing companion. Hence, The Lodger is companion-lite, but The Waters of Mars isn't.
  • They aren't stories in which only some of the companions make a reduced appearance. Vincent and the Doctor might very well be "Rory-lite", but it's not companion-lite as Amy makes a full appearance. In addition, Rory had ceased to exist at the end of Cold Blood, making the hypothetical "Rory-lite" term inaccurate as he was not an ongoing companion.
  • They aren't stories in which a character has a reduced appearance in a single episode of a multi-part story. In the Hartnell and Troughton eras, several individual episodes had a reduced role for their companions as a result of the filming schedule of the time and the serialised nature of the programme.
  • Torchwood, The Sarah Jane Adventures, Doctor Who Magazine backup comics, or any of a number of Big Finish Productions ranges aren't Doctor-lite — they're spin-offs. Spinoff stories can be "character-lite" themselves, such as Whatever Happened to Sarah Jane?, but this is stretching an already thin term.

Footnotes[[edit] | [edit source]]