Forum:Dealing with the Cracks: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
m (Sorry for having to do this, but I'm being forced to change my sig, and clean up after it, by Wikia Staff) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{archive|Panopticon archives}}[[Category:Page-specific discussions]] | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
I think it is time we finally got round to sorting out the [[Time Field]] article. It should in fact be three separate articles. | I think it is time we finally got round to sorting out the [[Time Field]] article. It should in fact be three separate articles. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
The main argument for the split is the fact that each have been given different names and that after the cracks were stopped and removed, the time energy would still exist, so is a different thing. Thoughts? Objections? --[[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 11:51, September 15, 2010 (UTC) | The main argument for the split is the fact that each have been given different names and that after the cracks were stopped and removed, the time energy would still exist, so is a different thing. Thoughts? Objections? --[[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 11:51, September 15, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Big old objection. Where you gettin' these definitions from? And do we really know enough about this subject yet to write with any hard definition? Isn't series 6 supposed to give us more info about all this? {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} | :Big old objection. Where you gettin' these definitions from? And do we really know enough about this subject yet to write with any hard definition? Isn't series 6 supposed to give us more info about all this? {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''20:41:58 Tue '''15 Mar 2011 </span> | ||
::The Time Field article doesn't appear to be overspilling with information, it doesn't seem to be crying out for breaking into different articles. | ::The Time Field article doesn't appear to be overspilling with information, it doesn't seem to be crying out for breaking into different articles. | ||
::We still don't have all the information about the Time Field/Cracks, which is, as CzechOut says what Series 6 is supposed to inform us about. | ::We still don't have all the information about the Time Field/Cracks, which is, as CzechOut says what Series 6 is supposed to inform us about. | ||
::I don't think we've got enough information to split between three articles. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 14:40, March 16, 2011 (UTC) | ::I don't think we've got enough information to split between three articles. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 14:40, March 16, 2011 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:25, 28 August 2012
Forums → Archive index → Panopticon archives → Dealing with the Cracks
I think it is time we finally got round to sorting out the Time Field article. It should in fact be three separate articles.
- Crack - This article should be about the shape of the crack itself, instances of it etc and the history of how the cracks were opened and closed.
- Time Field - This is the area which the energy expands allowing the Time Energy to move out and erase people.
- Time Energy - The actual energy which erases things from the universe. Described as the "fire at the end of the universe".
The main argument for the split is the fact that each have been given different names and that after the cracks were stopped and removed, the time energy would still exist, so is a different thing. Thoughts? Objections? --The Thirteenth Doctor 11:51, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Big old objection. Where you gettin' these definitions from? And do we really know enough about this subject yet to write with any hard definition? Isn't series 6 supposed to give us more info about all this?
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 20:41:58 Tue 15 Mar 2011
- The Time Field article doesn't appear to be overspilling with information, it doesn't seem to be crying out for breaking into different articles.
- We still don't have all the information about the Time Field/Cracks, which is, as CzechOut says what Series 6 is supposed to inform us about.
- I don't think we've got enough information to split between three articles. --Tangerineduel / talk 14:40, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
