|
|
| (61 intermediate revisions by 31 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Talk Page}}
| |
| ==Episode Names.==
| |
| None of the names of the episodes have been revealed so they should be removed from the page until confirmation happens which will not be for a long time. Episode titles should be changed back to (TBA). [[Special:Contributions/92.6.80.22|92.6.80.22]] 10:21, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| :All titles, including that of the Christmas special will need to be removed. I have added a cleanup tag until this is done. '''[http://doctor-who-collectors.wikia.com/wiki/User:Tardis1963 <span style="background:#0E234E; color:white">Tardis1963</span>]''' 10:35, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
| | {{ArchCat}} |
| :Which it now has been. :) Woulda done it myself but don't have the time or patience. '''[http://doctor-who-collectors.wikia.com/wiki/User:Tardis1963 <span style="background:#0E234E; color:white">Tardis1963</span>]''' 10:43, June 27, 2010 (UTC) The 2010 christmas special is named 'A Christmas Carol' after the novel by Charles Dickens, and features the doctor being the ghost of Christmas Past.
| |
|
| |
|
| ==2011 Christmas special== | | == image placement off<strike> |
| Don't jump the gun, folks. I just removed a comment "presuming a 2011 Christmas special". Aside from being waaaaay premature, if such a special is announced, it will be part of Series 7, just as the 2010 special was announced in the context of it being Series 6. If it's handled differently (as was Series 4 which actually saw two Christmas specials filmed during its production schedule) we'll know in due course. But the production of the 2010 special hasn't even begun yet. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 18:59, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
| | </strike> == |
| ==Karen Gillan== | |
| Though I can't see all of it due to subscription lock, this source claims she is back next series and it appears to be reputable.[http://www.broadcastnow.co.uk/news/broadcasters/bbc/matt-smith-confirmed-for-more-doctor-who/5011933.article]--[[User:Golden Monkey|Golden Monkey]] 19:48, March 20, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| | <strike>the images are overlapping the episode list. I don't know how to fix it and I don't want to make it worse. I just wanted to let someone who can fix it know.</strike>[[User:Tivis014|Tivis014]] <sup>[[User talk:Tivis014|talk to me]]</sup> 04:30, December 22, 2011 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| | | :It seems to be fixed now[[User:Tivis014|Tivis014]] <sup>[[User talk:Tivis014|talk to me]]</sup> 04:30, December 22, 2011 (UTC) |
| I folloed the source on the page, and it seems pretty vaige. Can anyone find a better one? Because I can't, and I beleive that without a reliable source we can't be completley sure that Amy will be returning. Hope so, though! : ) [[User:MidnightCat|MidnightCat]] 11:47, May 23, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| *When they confirmed Matt Smith returning at the press conference, they didn't confirm the return of Karen. My guess is that they were waiting to see how she faired with the audience. My guess is she will be back at some point. [[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 20:58, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == 2010 Christmas Special ==
| |
| | |
| Why is the information about the 2010 Christmas Special on this page. In the past the Christmas Specials have always been classed to the previous series. Therefore this needs to be removed and be placed on Series 5. -- [[User:Michael Downey|Michael Downey]] 21:38, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :Not sure I follow you, here. Christmas specials are the beginning of the new series. 2005 is the start of 2006 series; 2006 the beginning of the 2007 series, and so on, with the 2009 specials being a bit of an oddity. From a production standpoint, all but the 2008 special have been filmed after a hiatus, so they're clearly not a part of the previous series in terms of production. In terms of marketing, they've '''all''' been in the box set of the next year's stories. And it will be no different with the 2010 special. It's not going to be on the series 5 box set, which will clearly come out before the special is even made. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 01:19, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| If you wish to discuss this further, then please visit the 'series wars' thread on the forums.[[User:Dalekcaan14|Dalekcaan14]] 20:07, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Its now november we have a title, we have a cast & we have a basic plot. Should we think about creating the page? [[User:Joshoedit|Joshoedit]] 05:00, November 5, 2010 (UTC) No SJA series 4 needs ALOT of work before we focus ob christmas [[User:Joshoedit|Joshoedit]] 05:45, November 17, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :
| |
| | |
| ==Jonathan Ross==
| |
| There was an interview with Matt Smith on the Jonathan Ross show, and he revealed info about the series. I can't remember it though, so somebody'll have to look it up on BBC iPlayer, because Episode 6 was revealed. {{SUBST:User:Tigernose/sig}} 17:36, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == RTD to write for Series 6 ==
| |
| | |
| RTD will write an episode for this series - confirmed [http://www.southcom.com.au/~seymour/aprilfool/jester.gif here] [[Special:Contributions/188.221.79.22|188.221.79.22]] 10:14, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| That's called an April Fool. -- [[User:Dragonfree97|<span style="color:#006400;">Dragonfree</span>]] 19:53, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Thank heaven it ''is'' an April Fool. [[User:Bluebox444|Bluebox444]] 22:30, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Its August. [[User:Who7|Who7]] 09:56, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == unconfirmed cast ==
| |
| | |
| If it's unconfirmed - why have it in the article? [[Special:Contributions/188.221.79.22|188.221.79.22]] 19:32, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Joanna Page has not been confirmed either - The reference won't load, but the original story was by a less-than-reputable tabloid newspaper 'The Daily Star'. Both Page and the BBC have since denied involvement. So she needs to be removed... and people should be more careful over the use of the word 'confirmed'[[Special:Contributions/86.184.48.234|86.184.48.234]] 01:32, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Series numbering ==
| |
| | |
| Moffat's made it very clear that this is not series 6, period. The internal production numbering will be "2". Maybe we should stick with "32".
| |
| | |
| [[Special:Contributions/67.241.25.16|67.241.25.16]] 02:09, April 18, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| The reason he made is clear that this isn't season 6 is because he was afraid of losing big name sponsors, who are usually put off by a season 6 kind of thing. Nobody's really sure how to refer to it yet. Or at least, BBC isn't. [[User:Musedae|Musedae]] 19:50, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Same as Series 5... we still aren't clear on that either! --[[User:The Brig|The Brig]] 10:40, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Doctor Who is so messed up with series (yes not seasons please that is american we are not american). Series 1 I would say was the originals but then again series 1 started again when it was 'remade' in whateveryearitwasthattheyhad chistopher eccleston for one series. pointless thing that was. they shouldn't be allowed to quit after one series. I would call it series 6 as its the 'new' doctor who's and has no acossiation with the old apart from the name. [[Special:Contributions/86.179.153.216|86.179.153.216]] 18:43, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Joanna Page ==
| |
| * The rumour had been removed by Mini-Mitch for no reason so I re-added. It has been confirmed by the Daily Star and I know they have had some un-true information in the past but they have also had some truths.(example of the titles for series 5 finale, months before the first title being confirmed) so it shall remain in the rumours page until properly confired or denied. -- [[User:Michael Downey|Michael Downey]] 18:56, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| * To be honest, I wouldn't trust the Daily Star, but it should stay untill the rumor has been proven true or false. (;,;) [[User:Son of Icthar|Son of Icthar]] 12:07, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ==Rory==
| |
| | |
| How do you know that it is likely Rory will return? [[Special:Contributions/72.82.17.84|72.82.17.84]] 00:52, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| He won't be appearing in Series 6. But he will make an appearance in the Christmas Special 2010 due to Amy and Rory's honeymoon. Because Amy can't have a honeymoon by herself. [[User:Who7|Who7]] 09:57, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| It is highly unlikely that he will not be in series 6 considering Moffat said he would. Several times. [[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 12:01, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| It has been confirmed by Stephen Moffat that Rory will be a regular in this series; in DWM 426 he talks of the series split and the "enormous, game-changing cliffhanger for the Doctor, Amy '''and Rory'''", and Neil Gaiman confirms he wrote for Rory in DWM 427. Other multiple sources have since supported this, so could someone change the article so that it says Arthur Darvill will return along with Matt and Karen? Thanks [[Special:Contributions/92.235.135.70|92.235.135.70]] 18:31, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ==Enemies==
| |
| Although no enemies have been confirmed, I'd love to see the return of Daleks, Weeping Angels, a Torchwood monster (like the Weevils) and a classic monster (like the Zygons) And since the Daleks have appeared in every other series, it is highly likely they will return. Also I'd like to see some new monsters (for at least 4 of the 10 stories)[[User:Fallen5|Fallen5]] 19:33, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :The Weeping Angels shouldn't return for at least another series. Anyway, this shouldn't be discussed here. Use the forums. {{User:Solar Dragon/Signature}} 19:45, May 3
| |
| | |
| :
| |
| | |
| :one enemy has been confirmed by stevan moffat and that is the silence look it up on youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ihzu-OPa4g4
| |
| :
| |
| :The only enemy that appears to be confirmed is the flying Shark in the 2010 Christmas Special which, if the conclusion of the third Adventure Game was correct, suggests the Christmas Special begins in London in the twenty-third century after the Great Flood. [[Special:Contributions/86.170.161.145|86.170.161.145]] 22:56, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :
| |
| | |
| | |
| It's very unlikely that the Christmas special will be straight on following the third Adventure Game for a few reasons.
| |
| | |
| 1. Rory is going to appear as it is their honeymoon and there is no Rory in the games
| |
| | |
| 2. The special is going to have a Christmas Carol twist and I heavily doubt that there will be a shark from the 23rd century there.
| |
| | |
| | |
| [[User:Adlerj|Adlerj]] 22:13, August 31, 2010 (UTC) | |
| ===Omega===
| |
| | |
| Why do people keep insisting that Omega will return? I've seen the rumors, and that's all they are obviously, flying around all through the build-up for Season 5 and now, not 24 hours after the finale to Season 5 has aired, people are once again insisting that Omega will return in Season 6. '''Let us remember that Omega is a Time Lord and all the Time Lords are gone, except The Doctor'''. I know, I know...they brought back The Master (why wouldn't they? he's been a recurring ''Doctor Who'' foe for a long, long time) and, very briefly, Rassillon, but that was only for a two-part finale episode. Omega does not qualify as a major foe, and in all honesty doesn't deserve to come back (my opinion only). Let's stop the Omega rumors. [[User:ScoutDaddy70|ScoutDaddy70]] 15:00, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| *Omega could come back because he's in the antimatter universe, and may not have even partisipated in the Time war. He could be breaking through to this universe again and thats whats causing the cracks, it just a possibility. [[User:evilyoda|Evilyoda]] 19:28, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| *I understand all that, however, for it to be an actual "spoiler" it needs to be based somewhere, somehow, on some facts. Has there been discussion of Omega from Moffat? Have the actors let slip anything? Or is all this Omega talk just the talk of fans hoping it is Omega? That's what I mean. Are people just wishing or are there concrete facts to back up this rumor? [[User:ScoutDaddy70|ScoutDaddy70]] 11:59, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| *Episodes 6 & 7 revolve around clones of the Doctor. Given that Omega tried to use the Doctor's DNA previously to create a body to escape, he could be using them as a means to try and return. ([[Special:Contributions/38.103.168.4|38.103.168.4]] 06:39, April 2, 2011 (UTC))
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| There's no evidence in canon to support specifically the return of Omega whatsoever. It's just a rumour made up on the turd of a website that is Gallifrey Base with no evidence to support the assertion. It shouldn't appear in the article, or even the Big Bang one if we're to stay true to Wiki principles. [[User:Blightsoot|Blightsoot]] 12:16, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| I agree you shouldn't bring Omega back. He is an old series enemy, and Moffat is trying to create new enemies. The only old enemies he'll bring back are Daleks, Cybermen, maybe The Master and then only the old monsters that were in the alliance (though most of them may not return). Omega is unlikely to return.[[User:Fallen5|Fallen5]] 14:00, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| In one interview (I don't remember where) Moffat referred to the Silence as being plural. This would seem to discount that idea that Omega is the Silence. If Moffat ever did bring back a character like Omega, he would probably do it in the same way he handled the Dream Lord/Valeyard connections, with implied rather than explicit links to the actual character from classic Who. But I'm pretty sure the Silence is something entirely new. [[User:Bluebox444|Bluebox444]] 12:51, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| I agree. Yes Rasillon and The Master have both returned at least once (The Master 5 to 6 times) but Omega has absolutley no
| |
| reason to return. Unless at least one person that has anything to do with the making of Series 6 is in love with the episode
| |
| that has Omega in it (which I doubt and I havnt seen it so I cant really explain this too well so dont comment on this)
| |
| I believe that almost everyone that had something to do with the show all together has forgotten almost completeley about him,
| |
| sort of like with amy and rory before the season finale. What I want to know is how the doctor escapes, Amy comes back to life
| |
| , how rory regained control, and how the girl the doctor told to fly the TARDIS to his location (I cant remember her name)
| |
| survives the explosion, and my biggest question about series 6... How the tardis returns from the ashes of the explosion.
| |
| If anyone has any ideas on how or finds something that mentions something about any of these questions please dont hesitate
| |
| to post them.
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Well I think it would be rather difficult for Omega to return since he was destroyed when Patrick Houghton's flute fell into the Tardis's forcefield generator (making it not converted to anitmatter), and when Omega knocked the forcefield generator out of Houghton's hands the anitmatter and matter collided and collapsed the blackhole that led into the anitmatter world, turning it into a supernova.≤DreamMaster≥
| |
| | |
| The 2nd Doctor's recorder somehow didn't kill him, because he was in [[Arc of Infinity (TV story)]]. Doctor Who kills off villains, and then brings them back all the time. Davros died in almost every episode he was in, The Master died in a few episodes of the classic series, the TV Movie, and twice in the new series, the Daleks were completely destroyed in most of their ninth and tenth doctor episodes. In Doctor Who, just because an enemy has been completely destroyed, it doesn't mean they will never return, so Moffat could bring back Omega if he wanted to.Icecreamdif 22:03, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| It is possible that Omega could return as he is all powerful and highly intelligent. And any all powerful and highly intelligent being who's worth his or her stuff, will always have a get out plan or several. [[User:Son of Icthar|Son of Icthar]] 16:52, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| It could be plausable as Omega created the Eye of Harmony hence controling the TARDIS so he may return to this universe. This could explain why the series 5 finale was full of parallel universes. He could of blew up the TARDIS so he could slip through the cracks. Omega may also send the TARDIS to go back to the time war and Skaro. This would explain the Skaro rumours.
| |
| | |
| ===Toy Maker===
| |
| | |
| | |
| He Could be in episode three the one in the doll house. [[User:Joshoedit|Joshoedit]] 20:29, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| I think thats likely, after all episode three is rumoured to be set in a dolls house, and on set pitures of monster dolls are now avadidble, and in the "Celestral Toy Maker" he did make the doctors companions face his dolls, and a few of the challanges were set in a giant doll house.
| |
| | |
| So what do you think? [[User:General MGD 109|General MGD 109]]
| |
| | |
| Moffat has also said no classic enemies will be returning this series. --The Brig 22:33, December 26, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| See below [[User:Joshoedit|Joshoedit]] 23:11, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ===No Classic..===
| |
| "No classic monsters in series 6.." Isn't that what they said LAST YEAR? and we got Daleks, Cybermen, Slurians & Sontarens [[User:Joshoedit|Joshoedit]] 19:06, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Another source also says the Mara is returning. One of them is wrong, but which one? (PS: I'm not sure if Omega is classified as a "monster" anyway... more of a person, really.) [[User:The Nth Doctor|The Nth Doctor]] 21:58, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Well true, Omega is in this section because when the page was cleaned up it was the best place to move it [[User:Joshoedit|Joshoedit]] 05:48, December 14, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| And now the sontarans are on set yeah, some one is lying through there teeth [[User:Joshoedit|Joshoedit]] 02:43, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ==Rumors section needs cleanup==
| |
| Since the article is semi-protected, could someone with access privileges please go through the Rumors section and repair the atrocious spelling and punctuation? Looks like a Judoon typed it up. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/68.146.81.123|68.146.81.123]] 03:43, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| *There's only one bit that needs cleaned up. The spelling is hardly atrocious, and we'd prefer it if you didn't call our regular users Judoon thank-you very much. [[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 10:09, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| *Haha, he was pwned! [[User:StickManLegend|StickManLegend]] 18:50, November 22, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| *That's an insult against us Judoon![[User:Wheresthebounty|@ThebountyOffice!]] 22:16, December 6, 2010 (UTC) 22:15, December 6, 2010 (GMT)
| |
| Bo Ro Do, Judoon Type Well. [[User:Alpha111|Alpha111]] 12:00, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ==Myths printed in widely-read sources==
| |
| I noticed that some of the rumours which have been debunked have been removed. Of course we can't keep track of all the rumours and it makes sense to cull some of the ones that prove to be false. However, I wonder if there should be an exception for media with a large distribution - if only to record that a mistake was picked up by outside media and widely reported. For example, the rumour about Joanna Page appeared in the Daily Star, a printed newspaper which claims 1,701 million readers (is that comma for a decimal point? Is that common in the UK?) The rumour about Matt Smith leaving was also picked up by Virgin Media on their TV News web video, and I'm not sure where to stand on that one - although I think the rumour itself can probably be traced back to one blog. These rumours won't count as unsourced, as you can cite where they were found - but they're not true. Where do we stand on these? [[User:TheangelJean|the angel Jean - Smith's little elf]] 11:45, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| *I've put them back. Nothing, save vandalism, should be removed without discussion first. These rumours should stay. They're actually important. We're here to document things related to Doctor Who, including rumours about the show, that's why we have the section. I mean, Matt Smith leaving. That's a ''really'' important rumour, and should stay. I have no idea why it was removed. We keep them ''all'' until the series ends, otherwise people who don't visit often read the sources of these rumours, then add them to the page and we simply have to remove them again. It's just easier to keep them until the series airs. [[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 17:35, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| **Should the rumour about Joanna Page, printed in the Daily Star, be put back in then? I mention this because the previous editor, who removed the other rumours, had previously lost an argument about the same thing - he said that the rumour about Joanna Page should be reinstated, but despite this the rumour was removed. So I can see why he would have been confused about what should stay and what should go. For consistency, the rumour should be reinstated (as a debunked one, in the Rumours section) ... right? [[User:TheangelJean|the angel Jean - Smith's little elf]] 07:03, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ***No, that rumour was for a series which is past. Everyone knows that she didn't appear, so they won't be adding it to the series page as they know she didn't appear. The rumours should only be there until the series airs. It'll save more work in the long run. --[[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 09:28, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ==Tom Baker's return.==
| |
| It is rumored that Tom Baker may return for a multi-doctor episode.Any information on this?
| |
| | |
| Tom Baker may return:http://lifetheuniverseandcombom.blogspot.com/2010/03/tom-baker-to-be-in-doctor-who-series-6.html
| |
| | |
| So should we list Tom Baker as a rumored return?
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| The rumors sound extremely vague, and they don't reference anything beyond "discussions"... even the source sounds uncertain about it. I'd say wait. [[Special:Contributions/159.28.161.150|159.28.161.150]] 06:27, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Series 6 & Series 7 ==
| |
| | |
| We need to change the template for the episodes so that it only shows 7 episodes and then add Series 7 because Moffat has confirmed they are 2 seperate series now. Does anyone know how to do that? :)
| |
| | |
| *No. All that has been said is that series 6 will be split into two halves. This is different than two different series. Many American shows have a break half way through, which is what this is, not an entirely new series. [[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 12:03, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| *Actually to agree with whoever wrote the first statement, Steven Moffat has confirmed the split will be two seperate series rather than a continuation in this interview. http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/video/2010/aug/29/doctor-who-cliffhanger-video) -- [[User:Michael Downey|Michael Downey]] 12:39, August 30, 2010 (UTC).
| |
| | |
| ::To be fair Moffat also called Series 5 Series 31 for a time, for now as with the discussion regarding 'Series 5 and what to call it' I think we need to wait for confirmation from the BBC, not just from Moffat. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:55, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :::And Moffat also said it would be called series one.
| |
| :::One thing from the video to note is he said that one series, "''by the standard of any other drama series''", is double the length. He then said it would be in Easter and the rest in autumn in "''series seven''", "''I suppose''". One other thing to bring up then is Matt Smith's run. It was said he'd stay for another three series, but is this meaning the half-series? --[[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 16:33, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :::another article: http://www.kasterborous.com/2010/08/29/more-series-6-split-details/ shows that there will be two series instead of splitting. maybe its time to split the article accordingly. [[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revanvolatrelundar]] 16:58, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :::That article is based on the video in the first link. Like Tangerineduel said, it's best to wait for a BBC source. Although he's head writer, Moffat doesn't decide what is classed as a series. [[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 17:11, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Semi-Protect ==
| |
| | |
| The Semi Protect will run out before episode one (based on the fact all other series started in april) [[User:Joshoedit|Joshoedit]] 06:01, September 28, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ==40 Teasers==
| |
| 01: The Doctor will be on trial - twice!<br />
| |
| 02: Who controls the Light Sculptors?<br />
| |
| 03: You won't believe what's burried under Wembley Stadium...<br />
| |
| 04: Scared of the Eye in Space? You should be...<br /> | |
| 05: Take up thy sins and walk - slowly.<br />
| |
| 06: There won't be a Pub Quiz on Tuesday because there won't be no pub.<br />
| |
| 07: Beau Gueste is cool.<br />
| |
| 08: Bow Street Runners are cool.<br />
| |
| 09: Bromley-by-bow is cool.<br />
| |
| 10: 4 August 1982 - Happy Birthday Ma'am.<br />
| |
| 11: Some lies are too much for the Psychic Paper.<br />
| |
| 12: "I won't be taking calls from THAT, Prime Minister" "Marc, where are you?"<br />
| |
| 13: The only water in the forest is the river.<br />
| |
| 14: What awaits the TARDIS at the Zero Point?<br />
| |
| 15: "72 years on and Rory's still terrified of Granny Grainger?<br />
| |
| 16: "I was lost in France."<br />
| |
| 17: How could a fellow Gallifreyan stoop so low?<br />
| |
| 18: Horror of Bankok.<br />
| |
| 19: "Give it up, Sweet Korn."<br />
| |
| 20: Argonite, Here?<br />
| |
| 21: Ordinary Block of Flats.<br />
| |
| 22: "If I saw them walking down the high street what would I think?" "I don't think you'd think anything at all, Amy"<br />
| |
| 23: Find the lady, BEFORE SHE FINDS YOU!<br />
| |
| 24: "Margaret, Come Back!"<br />
| |
| 25: The Doctor defeats the Sahara Desert.<br />
| |
| 26: Susannah's still alive.<br />
| |
| 27: Mill Green on Fire!<br />
| |
| 28: The Doctor will get married - twice!<br />
| |
| 29: What are the dangers of Port Olveron?<br />
| |
| 30: 502, but never 503.<br />
| |
| 31: Beware of the Kites.<br />
| |
| 32: A pillar of salt, yes, but not because she looked back... Looking back is good!<br />
| |
| 33: They'll have to get a new name for thanksgiving.<br />
| |
| 34: Pay attention - It's not really her...<br />
| |
| 35: Treading through the sand - on the one night they come back...<br />
| |
| 36: The Shuddering Brethren, they'll stick in your mind...<br />
| |
| 37: "I'm my own Doctor."<br />
| |
| 38: Octavian wasn't lying.<br />
| |
| 39: Mysterious semblance at the strand of nightmares.<br />
| |
| 40: The Bones of the TARDIS.
| |
| | |
| -[[User:Who7|Who7]] 17:09, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :Now we have an answer for 11 and 28...--[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:blue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 03:54, December 29, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::Well half of 28 [[User:Joshoedit|Joshoedit]] , Hang on #17, You can't have a conversation like that.. Ohhh [[User:Joshoedit|Joshoedit]] 06:33, December 30, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == The Doctor meets the Queen Mother ==
| |
| | |
| I'm wanting to add this rumour. The original source for the above teasers is [http://doctorwhotv.co.uk/41-teasers-from-doctor-who-series-6-9870.htm here] and number ten states "''4 August 1982 – Happy Birthday, Ma’am.''" Fourth August was the Queen Mother's birthday, and the Ma'am implies it is a queen or someone of royalty. Also, number 39, "''Octavian wasn’t lying.''" implies that he meets Octavian again. Any objections to adding these? [[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 16:57, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Octavian does not return. Not that I know of. Number 39 "Octavian Wasn't Lying", means that what he said about River killing a man was true. That could be something we find in Series 6 next year. [[User:Who7|Who7]] 09:33, October 3, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| *What exactly says he isn't returning? Octavian wasn't lying can refer to several things, including the "I think you know me at my best". This line implies he was worse off and that the Doctor would meet Octavian's past self. --[[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 11:13, October 3, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ==Rumours section==
| |
| | |
| Some of the rumours are just plain stupid, such as 'River Song will die' - impossible, unless we get 'Forest of the Dead Redux (Another Story)', and the Christmas Special being a musical? Liek, what the heck? [[User:Dragonfree97|<span style="color:#006400;">Dragonfree</span>]] <span style="color:Goldenrod">'''5000!'''</span> 10:56, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == 2010 Christmas Special Info ==
| |
| | |
| On a recent trip to Germany my sister has seen DW being filmed at Stansted Airport
| |
| | |
| No proof I'm afraid, but she says she saw David Walliams and Matt Lucas (in dresses) and the white dalek
| |
| | |
| Make of it what you will...
| |
| | |
| [[User:Lord Aro|Lord Aro]] 22:37, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| *Well, I think it's more likely to be a promotional thing, and it won't be the christmas special because that's wrapped up. Aren't they filming in America just now? --[[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 08:13, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| *That was for a promotional clip for "Come Fly With Me", not Doctor Who. the clips can be seen on the BBC between programmes [[Special:Contributions/91.125.84.80|91.125.84.80]] 17:22, December 30, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ==The Break==
| |
| If episode 6 is part 1 and episode 7 is part 2 and we've credited Steven Moffat with ep. 6 why not ep. 7 [[User:Joshoedit|Joshoedit]] 07:11, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Amy's Secret ==
| |
| | |
| "Future Doctor" unless its a'la The Next Doctor or is almost completly obscuered by the camera light like Prof. Moriaty in Sherlock Holmes. [[User:Joshoedit|Joshoedit]] 19:15, November 25, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == The Horror of Bangkok (18) .... this is listed above ==
| |
| | |
| '''"The Horror of Bangkok" ''''sounds pretty similar to a classic series title, '''"The Horror of Fang Rock"''' in which the enemy which faced the Doctor was the Rutans. This as far as I know isnt already a rumour, but could the Rutans return for an episode called "The Horror of Bangkok" ? (Just a thought :D) - ~~'''Topgeardog~~'''
| |
| | |
| == River ==
| |
| | |
| Can we put her in secondary she wasn't seen shooting episode 3 [[User:Joshoedit|Joshoedit]] 18:40, December 5, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == T.C.T.W.C.B.T.A.U. (The Clone that will come back to annoy us) ==
| |
| | |
| Where do we put it 4 cast
| |
| | |
| With The Doctors Credit which will look stupid because he isn't a main character (The Doctor/The Doctors Clone - Matt Smith) or under guest that will also look stupid. Where? [[User:Joshoedit|Joshoedit]] 03:53, December 11, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Just do whatever we did in series 4 for the meta-crisis Doctor.[[User:Icecreamdif|Icecreamdif]] 03:56, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Roumers ==
| |
| | |
| why is the 40 hints in the big book in rumours, and why in the RUMORED synopsis of episodes 5&6 in story notes? [[User:Joshoedit|Joshoedit]] 23:34, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == The Case of Writing the Finale? ==
| |
| | |
| It says that Steven Moffat will write 6 Episodes this Year INCLUDING A Christmas Carol.
| |
| | |
| ... This would, therefore, imply that he is one Episode Short of writing the Finale:
| |
| #A Christmas Carol
| |
| #Series Opener: Pt.1
| |
| #Series Opener: Pt.2
| |
| #Cliffhanger: Pt.1
| |
| #Cliffhanger: Pt.1
| |
| #<One Episode>
| |
| Therefore, he cannot be writing the Finale unless he is only writing one of 12 or 13.
| |
| | |
| Is there any clarification on the case of who's writing what, or if the 6 Episode information is wrong?
| |
| | |
| 1.Please sign your posts and 2. Yeah; 12 & 13 are a two parter so the 6 episode thing must be wrong. Unless someone else is writing the finale... [[User:Alpha111|Alpha111]] 22:00, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Or most likely on the BBC website 4 the show a Christmas Special is episode 14 of series 5. so when Xmas is gone you add one more then 12/13 [[User:Joshoedit|Joshoedit]] 19:31, January 10, 2011 (UTC) (or that some one can not count)
| |
| | |
| You forgot it says and the Christmas special it must be a typo. [[User:Alpha111|Alpha111]] 09:18, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Who said the Finale will be a two-parter anyway? [[Special:Contributions/81.110.190.227|81.110.190.227]] 18:00, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Oh yeah; we presumed it because the last 5 series had multi part finales. [[User:Alpha111|Alpha111]] 13:33, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Could you change it then. SM is not going to let anyone else write the finale, he's said that this finale will be more intimate and that he will write 6 episodes including ACC. The structure has changed so assume nothing.[[Special:Contributions/81.110.190.227|81.110.190.227]] 20:21, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Mini-Mitch keeps on changing it back despite it being discussed here. [[User:Alpha111|Alpha111]] 20:38, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| I just looked at the source and it's out of date and isn't proof, which they admit "This episode guide will be updated regularly as more details are confirmed.."[[Special:Contributions/81.110.190.227|81.110.190.227]] 19:33, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Now we have episode names but no sources for them![[Special:Contributions/81.110.190.227|81.110.190.227]] 18:47, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| The episode notes say that 12-13 are a two-parter and the source for it also says:
| |
| | |
| 1.The Impossible Astronaut (Part1 - Episode 1) - 23 April 2011 on BBC One''' Writer''': Steven Moffat
| |
| Director''': Toby Haynes'''
| |
| | |
| '''2.''' Day of the Moon''' (Part 2 - Episode 2)'''''' Writers''': Steven Moffat'''''
| |
| Director''': Toby Haynes'''
| |
| | |
| '''3. No Title Yet (1 Episode)'''''' Writers''': Neil Gaiman'''''
| |
| Director''': Richard Clark'''
| |
| | |
| '''4. What Are Little Boys Made Of? (1 Episode)'''''' Writers''': Mark Gatiss'''''
| |
| Director''': Richard Clark'''
| |
| | |
| '''5. No Title Yet (Part 1 - Episode 1)'''''' Writers''': Matthew Graham'''''
| |
| Director''': Julian Simpson'''
| |
| | |
| '''6. The Rebel Flesh (Part 1 - Episode 1)'''''' Writers''': Matthew Graham'''''
| |
| Director''': Julian Simpson'''
| |
| | |
| '''7. No Title Yet (Part 2 - Episode 2)'''''' Writers''': Steven Moffat'''''
| |
| Director''': ?'''
| |
| | |
| '''8. No Title Yet (Part 2 - Episode 2)'''''' Writers''': Steven Moffat'''''
| |
| Director''': ?'''
| |
| | |
| '''9. No Title Yet (Part 2 - Episode 2)'''''' Writers''': ?'''''
| |
| Director''': ?'''
| |
| | |
| '''10. No Title Yet (1 Episode)'''''' Writers''': ?'''''
| |
| Director''': ?ll'''
| |
| | |
| '''11. No Title Yet (1 Episode)'''''' Writers''': ?'''''
| |
| Director''': ?'''
| |
| | |
| 12. No Name Yet (Part 1 - Episode 1)
| |
| Writers: ?
| |
| Director''': ?'''
| |
| | |
| '''13. No Title Yet (Part 2 - Episode 2)'''''' Writers''': ?'''''
| |
| Director''': ?'''
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Looks like a wibbbly-wobbly year to me! [[Special:Contributions/10.7.10.169|10.7.10.169]] 19:10, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Your proof doesn't prove anything apart from the fact that nobody know anything about the series finale[[Special:Contributions/81.110.190.227|81.110.190.227]] 19:20, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| [[User:Iamkayla|Iamkayla]] 02:22, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ==Ood.==
| |
| | |
| Why does Mini-Mitch insist on repeatedly removing this? They are in the trailer, and they wouldn't be in the trailer unless they were in the show! I usually dont take part in edit-wars, but this is just ridiculous! Fan555 [[Special:Contributions/77.96.132.253|77.96.132.253]] 22:28, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| There is also a picture in this months issue of DWM. SO there is no reason for the deletion of this picture. (;,;)[[User:Son of Icthar|Son of Icthar]] 15:54, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Episode 3, I mean 4 i mean 7 ==
| |
| | |
| I'm Confused on rumours it says MONKS IN EPISODE 7 as per the writers Twitter BUT due to the episode swap thing isn't ep. 7 now ep. 3[[User:Joshoedit|Joshoedit]] 05:51, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Demonds Run ==
| |
| | |
| Is this the acutual ep. 7 name? [[User:Alpha111|Alpha111]] 13:36, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Rory isn't the only male companion since 1975 ==
| |
| | |
| it says that rory is coming back for the whole series and that its the first male companion since 1975, this is wrong, there was Adric with the 5th doctor in the early 80's
| |
| | |
| Yes, But in earthsock, he died, and Earthshock was not the last episode of the season.
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| [[Special:Contributions/68.180.113.50|68.180.113.50]] 01:29, February 9, 2011 (UTC)Sam[[Special:Contributions/68.180.113.50|68.180.113.50]] 01:29, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| I Put it there sorry if theres the confusion. Its Just that as said before all male companions either left or started there work on the show without filling a whole season. As Rory was made a companion in the big bang and will lats (at least) untill episode 13 [[User:Joshoedit|Joshoedit]] 02:17, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Is that really significant enough to be noted on the page. Aric and Turlough both lasted the length of an entire season, just not through one season. Rory lasting an entire season isn't really any different from Adric and Turlough.[[User:Icecreamdif|Icecreamdif]] 04:07, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| :He is the first ''[[human]]'' male companion since 1975, though. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''00:54:55 Thu '''31 Mar 2011 </span>
| |
| | |
| == Rumor and note removed ==
| |
| | |
| I removed the following rumor and note because their reference was a dead link: --[[User:*Kat*|*Kat*]] 08:08, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| *Episodes 5 & 6 will feature incomplete clones and robot droids from the future, who also accuse the Doctor of being a clone.<br />*Episode 5 and 6 will feature incomplete clones.
| |
| | |
| ==Rumours on the loose==
| |
| I keep on noticing different things with the word rumoured in it, OUTSIDE the section appropriatly named, rumours. I mean, in Episode Notes it says:
| |
| *A rumoured synopsis of ''Rebel Flesh ''and ''Gangers'' has been released..........
| |
| *It is rumoured that Series 6 will begin on the 9th April 2011
| |
| and on Episodes it says:
| |
| *Night Terrors (rumoured)
| |
| I mean, this is just silly. Rumours belong where rumours are supposed to be. I thought this was in the policy. Please can an admin just delete them because I bet that if I did it, I would get murdered, so really, please just make it clear that you CAN'T add rumours where rumours aren't supposed to be.....
| |
| | |
| [[User:Ghastly9090|Ghastly9090]] 16:00, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Demons Run Cliffhanger ==
| |
| | |
| Does anyone else think the rumoured mid series cliffhanger are a bit pathetic for Moffat stories. I mean his episode cliffhangers include: The doctor about to die, The doctor trapped for eternity, the doctor about to die, etc. and things like amy becoming pregnant and river song revealing her true identity dont seem like his type of cliffhanger. [[User:Alpha111|Alpha111]] 08:06, February 22, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Thats Why It's called a rumor [[User:Joshoedit|Josho]] 07:42, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Episode 12/13 ==
| |
| | |
| Episode 12: Apparently Craig Owens will reprise his role in Episode 12 according to What's on TV and [http://doctorwhotv.co.uk/corden-back-in-the-lodger-2-15978.htm www.doctorwhotv.co.uk] say possibly Gareth Roberts (Writer of The Lodger) will be writing a script and Episode 12/13 will have two writers so it all connects. The trailer shows the consle in The Lodger in the Series 6 trailer. Could all of this connect or is this one big coincidence. [[User:The mysterious|The mysterious]] 20:28, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == America/BBC website ==
| |
| | |
| Will it be possible to watch the episodes on BBC's site from the U.S. this year? [[User:Sorryaboutthatchief|Sorryaboutthatchief]] 06:20, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == premier date ==
| |
| | |
| I have just looked at IMDB and they have allready dates listed for the sixth season (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0436992/episodes#season-6). [[User:Big-head42|Big-head42]] 21:23, March 6, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| April 23rd, 2011 for the USA and UK [[User:Iamkayla|Iamkayla]] 02:18, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Cybermat ==
| |
| | |
| It is confirmed that a Cybermat is going to appear in the same episode as Craig Owens as the doctor was with Craig and
| |
| | |
| it is pretty obvious what it is: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xitc1WQX1l8
| |
| | |
| Could someone please edit the page because it wont let me. [[User:Ojcoolj|Ojcoolj]] 18:18, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Departure ==
| |
| | |
| Am i the only one on those on-ste pictures that HASN'T seen roary in those photos or proof that amy is leaving [[User:Joshoedit|Josho]] 06:31, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == DWM 432 ==
| |
| | |
| It says that episode 11 is called the god complex, episode 10 is written by Tom MacRae and directed by Nick Hurran.
| |
| | |
| | |
| It doesn,t however mention 12 + 13 being a 2-parter and indicates against it (it does however mention their respecive writers).[[Special:Contributions/81.110.190.227|81.110.190.227]] 18:22, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Episode pages ==
| |
| | |
| Now that we have had some of the titles confirmed, can we start creating the pages for series six episodes? --[http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/User:Whoisdrwho | Who is Dr. Who?] 13:03, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ::I've tried. I was trying to start making an episode page for "The Impossible Planet", but it said it couldn't be made... [[User:TheTARDIScontroller|TheTARDIScontroller]] 04:04, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| :::Well, you won't be able to create "The Impossible Planet" because that already exists. But no, the pages shouldn't be created yet, even if we do have titles. There's still weeks left, and in that time all we'll get is a load of people adding in rumours or vandalising, plus red links then going off, creating character pages that will need to be changed because the character's name in the show is different to the reported one, and those pages could have rumours or be vandalised as well, not to mention they would all be spoiler articles, and with spoilers being something we try to keep out of the central hub of the wiki, wouldn't be a good idea. --[[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 22:23, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| ::::Gotcha...so at what point do we create the pages? [http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/User:Whoisdrwho | Who is Dr. Who?] 13:59, March 30, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| :::::
| |
| :::::I think we should make the pages around two weeks before the episode airs because it allows enough time for the correct info to be put on and little time for people to put vandilism on the pages. [[User:Alpha111|Alpha111]] 12:54, March 31, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| :: Sorry, I meant The Impossible Astronaut.. And that makes sense.. [[User:TheTARDIScontroller|TheTARDIScontroller]] 22:39, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == River Song = Jenny ==
| |
| | |
| Could River song be Jenny (the doctor's daughter) and there both alike in many ways. She cannot be the the doctor's wife if she has any relation to the doctor it has to be the doctor's daughter or the doctor himself. [[User:The mysterious|The mysterious]] 10:39, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| How could River possibly be Jenny. Apart from how weird it would be if the Doctor's daughter was flirting with him, the Doctor would be able to sense if River was a Timelord. Also, Jenny didn't regenerate when she got shot in The Doctor's Daughter, and Jenny and River look nothing like each other. The only theory that makes less sense than River being Jenny, is River being the Doctor. That would be against the First Law of Time, River needed a vortex manipulator to travel through time instead of a TARDIS, River is a woman, the Doctor never calls himself to ask for help, and she didn't realize how early it was in the Doctor's timeline in Silence in the Library. River Song is a new character, not an old character in disguise.[[User:Icecreamdif|Icecreamdif]] 23:01, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == New sonic screwdriver? ==
| |
| | |
| If you noticed in the Impossible Astronaut promo poster, you can't really see the sonic screwdriver. Only the green diode, so that leads me to believe that he has gotten a new one (since the other one was destroyed in the christmas special). Do you guys think that's the case? [[User:TheTARDIScontroller|TheTARDIScontroller]] 17:22, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Susanne Jones as the Doctor's wife? ==
| |
| | |
| It says under casting notes that the character of Idris in ''The Doctor's Wife ''will play the Doctor's wife. This statement needs to be removed immediately as it has no basis in fact at all. For one thing, the source it states I have looked at, and all it is is an article reporting on the naming of Gaiman's episode, and pointing out that Susanne Jones (playing Idris) has been speculated to be playing the Doctor's wife, and this now looks likely. There is no official confirmation at all.<br />
| |
| Furthermore, the statement says that the '''character''' of Idris (not Susanna Jones, who plays her) will be playing the Doctor's wife "co-incidentally" (what is that suppoosed to mean!?) but the reference says the actress. Please, someone delete or change this. [[Special:Contributions/82.42.249.145|82.42.249.145]] 20:36, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| : I've removed it, but somebody keeps adding it back in. Maybe we should consider protecting the article again? [http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/User:Whoisdrwho | Who is Dr. Who?] 19:50, March 30, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| :: Thanks for trying :-) Who keeps putting this back in! It has been clearly pointed out that the source is not valid as it doesn't back up the statement, and even the statement itself gets the character Idris mixed up with the actress! Can someone make sure that this doesn't keep getting added back in? Or, at least, change it so it makes more sense, and move it to the rumours section (as there is no confirmation that Idris is the Doctor's Wife). [[Special:Contributions/82.42.249.145|82.42.249.145]] 14:40, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == "New suit" ==
| |
| | |
| In Silence in the library or what ever part 2 was. River said her second to last time with the Doctor she mentioned a new suit and the Doctor has a new suit in episode 12..[[User:Joshoedit|Josho]] 01:49, March 29, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :: Well one of the rumours is "River will die this series".. Maybe it could be reffering to the death in silence in the library and the whole suit thing leads into that.. If you get what I'm saying...
| |
| | |
| == 9th and 10th Doctor's Tardis return ==
| |
| | |
| In the Offical Series 6 trailer at 0.38 it seems the 9th and 10th doctor's Tardis seems to be in Series 6 as an explosion is seen in the heart of the tardis. As well as a figure which looks like the 10th doctor.[[User:The mysterious|The mysterious]] 20:36, March 30, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| SIGN YOUR POSTS [[User:Joshoedit|Josho]] 18:56, March 30, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Ive taken a look at a high res screengrab of the scene and the figure is Rory and not the Tenth Doctor I'm afraid. --[[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revan]]\[[User_talk:Revanvolatrelundar|Talk]] 20:59, March 30, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Actually it detinitely looks like Rory AND Amy [[User:StefanDurn|StefanDurn]] 17:43, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Grr! The "Confirmed Cast" section says that previous Doctor's not returning "may prove false due to rumours and the new trailer". This should not be there! If it is a rumour then it shouldn't be in the confirmed cast section, and (as pointed out above) there is no evidence in the trailer either - just Rory! The TARDIS may be a mistake, like seen in The Time of Angels when tne Doctor rescues River. [[Special:Contributions/82.42.249.145|82.42.249.145]] 07:24, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| [[File:10thDoctor.png|frame|The Tardis in the Offical Series 6 trailer.]]
| |
| | |
| == Revanvolatrelundar ==
| |
| | |
| Can a senior admin please talk to this guy. He is a brand new admin and I think he is abusing his powers. He keeps reverting an edit without explanation. I asked him to read the talk page first and he refused. He simply reverts the edit without making any comments. It has already been pointed out that a particular rumor is bogus and he insists on putting it back. I will not get into an edit war with this guy, but I can really use some help. [http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/User:Whoisdrwho | Who is Dr. Who?] 23:36, March 30, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Paul McGann as the Ninth Doctor ==
| |
| | |
| Really? Come on. I'm not removing it as it will just be reverted. Can someone please take care of this? Can we do something about all the baseless rumors being posted on this page? [http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/User:Whoisdrwho | Who is Dr. Who?] 23:40, March 30, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Don't you mean Eighth Doctor? I added that rumor and its not made up completely, it has a source. Anyway, what is your explanation for the Tenth Doctor's TARDIS appearing in the series 6 trailer? Looks like a regeneration happening to me and I its either the Eight Doctor regenerating or the Tenth regenerating. I don't think its the Ninth regenerating. Gryffindor1991 16:54, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| :Please look at the history. It said ninth doctor. Somebody fixed it, just like I asked. Thank you. [[User:Whoisdrwho|Who is Dr. Who?]] \ [[User_talk:Whoisdrwho|Talk]] 17:44, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| :
| |
| :Well I must have just made a typo and said Ninth. At least its fixed now, sorry about that. I understand what you mean. McGann as the Ninth Doctor? That would make no sense. Gryffindor1991 05:15, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ==Tidy up bullet points==
| |
| We really need to tidy up the amount of bullet points in this article. Tidy them, Condense them, combine them, whatever, but we have WAY to many. [[User:Fan555|Fan555]] 18:08, March 31, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :Erm. No. There nothing wring with the bullet points. Each pint represents a different piece of information, which is why we have them as bullet-point. Also, it's easier for people to read. All this article does at this stage is give quickfire information, once the Series is over, we then deleted, combined and merge the appropriate information. Too many bullet-points is better than very few, large paragraphs. [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 18:12, March 31, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| :
| |
| :Fair enough, but I was just thinking some of them are the same or near enough identical. Up to you in the end. [[Special:Contributions/80.193.182.191|80.193.182.191]] 08:14, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == tenth doc's tardis ==
| |
| | |
| it could be possible that it isn't the ninth/tenth's tardis but just another room in the current tardis.
| |
| | |
| You can see the TARDIS console, so it is definetly a console room. Since the Eleventh Hour strongly implied that the Eleventh Doctor's console room is the same room as the Ninth and Tenth, but repaired after the explosion, then the room in the trailer is the Ninth and Tenth Doctor's TARDIS, unless there are 2 identical rooms in the TARDIS.[[User:Icecreamdif|Icecreamdif]] 18:42, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| It could be the secondary control room. [[user:Tennantfan|TF - Supreme in every way]] 19:43, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| :...It could also be the control room of the cloned TARDIS. --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:blue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 20:18, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Moffat placed a line in Time Crash where the console room had a "desktop theme", its likely the theme just gets set back to "coral" from the current steampunk version. --[[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revan]]\[[User_talk:Revanvolatrelundar|Talk]] 20:23, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
| |
