More actions
GhastlyKhaos (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Forumheader|Panopticon}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> I was just looking at the discussion "When can we ...") |
m (Updating links from Series 6 (Doctor Who) to Series 6 (Doctor Who 2005)) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{archive|Panopticon archives}}[[category:policy explanations]] | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
I was just looking at the discussion "When can we create a Impossible Astronaut" page, and I saw a comment made by Tangerineduel (why can't his name be shorter?!) saying that this wiki is an encyclopedia, not a news source, which I agree. But why don't we make a new template, or even special pages, that are specially for news, take the Series 6 page for example. I know we already have the regularly updated Doctor Who Newspage at the bottom of the main page. I know this is a fairly pointless thing to point out, I'm only 11! [[User:Ghastly9090|Ghastly9090]] 16:35, April 18, 2011 (UTC) | I was just looking at the discussion "When can we create a Impossible Astronaut" page, and I saw a comment made by Tangerineduel (why can't his name be shorter?!) saying that this wiki is an encyclopedia, not a news source, which I agree. But why don't we make a new template, or even special pages, that are specially for news, take the Series 6 page for example. I know we already have the regularly updated Doctor Who Newspage at the bottom of the main page. I know this is a fairly pointless thing to point out, I'm only 11! [[User:Ghastly9090|Ghastly9090]] 16:35, April 18, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:You mean Series pages? Such as [[Series 6 (Doctor Who 2005)|Series 6]], [[Series 4 (Torchwood)|Series 4]] and [[Series 5 (The Sarah Jane Adventures)|Series]]? [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 16:41, April 18, 2011 (UTC) | |||
::I'm not sure what you're asking. News is reported information. As I said, on the other discussion anything we write needs a source, much like an essay, journal or of course, an encyclopædia. | |||
::When we present information, such as on the Series pages that Mini-mitch has linked to we read the sources, the news sources in those cases and pull out the relevant information and then source it. Those sources are the ones reporting the news we're interpreting and then presenting the information that is relevant to that particular subject. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 15:01, April 19, 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:54, 25 April 2024
Forums → Archive index → Panopticon archives → Tardis Index not news source-encyclopedia
I was just looking at the discussion "When can we create a Impossible Astronaut" page, and I saw a comment made by Tangerineduel (why can't his name be shorter?!) saying that this wiki is an encyclopedia, not a news source, which I agree. But why don't we make a new template, or even special pages, that are specially for news, take the Series 6 page for example. I know we already have the regularly updated Doctor Who Newspage at the bottom of the main page. I know this is a fairly pointless thing to point out, I'm only 11! Ghastly9090 16:35, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- You mean Series pages? Such as Series 6, Series 4 and Series? Mini-mitch\talk 16:41, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you're asking. News is reported information. As I said, on the other discussion anything we write needs a source, much like an essay, journal or of course, an encyclopædia.
- When we present information, such as on the Series pages that Mini-mitch has linked to we read the sources, the news sources in those cases and pull out the relevant information and then source it. Those sources are the ones reporting the news we're interpreting and then presenting the information that is relevant to that particular subject. --Tangerineduel / talk 15:01, April 19, 2011 (UTC)