Howling:The Moff is messing with us!: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-{{Forumheader|The Howling}} +{{Archive|The Howling archives}})) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
seriously, though. why else would he cater to the "river song is the doctor's wife" theory by naming an episode "the doctor's wife"? i know a lot of people who used the title of the episode as PROOF that river is his wife, when in fact the word wife was never used in the episode! i know moffat didn't actually write the episode, but with all the name changes that episode went through, i don't doubt that moffat, being a producer, ordered the change in title. it really doesn't surprise me now that he's catering to the "amy is river/little girl" theory by bringing up such a line like "the only water in the forest is a river" or whatever! now i know moffat didn't write the episode but he could have, under the title of head writer, tweaked the script up a bit to conform it to the overarching plot of the series. he's just playing into the stupid conspiracies to throw us off track. | seriously, though. why else would he cater to the "river song is the doctor's wife" theory by naming an episode "the doctor's wife"? i know a lot of people who used the title of the episode as PROOF that river is his wife, when in fact the word wife was never used in the episode! i know moffat didn't actually write the episode, but with all the name changes that episode went through, i don't doubt that moffat, being a producer, ordered the change in title. it really doesn't surprise me now that he's catering to the "amy is river/little girl" theory by bringing up such a line like "the only water in the forest is a river" or whatever! now i know moffat didn't write the episode but he could have, under the title of head writer, tweaked the script up a bit to conform it to the overarching plot of the series. he's just playing into the stupid conspiracies to throw us off track. | ||
the only reason i posted this was because i was tired of the same conspiracy theories over and over again...{{ | the only reason i posted this was because i was tired of the same conspiracy theories over and over again...{{Archive|The Howling archives}} | ||
Yes he is. And so long as he continues to write the episodes he writes as well as he does and commission episodes like this, he can mess with my mind as much as he likes.[[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] 01:44, May 19, 2011 (UTC) | Yes he is. And so long as he continues to write the episodes he writes as well as he does and commission episodes like this, he can mess with my mind as much as he likes.[[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] 01:44, May 19, 2011 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:59, 7 November 2011
seriously, though. why else would he cater to the "river song is the doctor's wife" theory by naming an episode "the doctor's wife"? i know a lot of people who used the title of the episode as PROOF that river is his wife, when in fact the word wife was never used in the episode! i know moffat didn't actually write the episode, but with all the name changes that episode went through, i don't doubt that moffat, being a producer, ordered the change in title. it really doesn't surprise me now that he's catering to the "amy is river/little girl" theory by bringing up such a line like "the only water in the forest is a river" or whatever! now i know moffat didn't write the episode but he could have, under the title of head writer, tweaked the script up a bit to conform it to the overarching plot of the series. he's just playing into the stupid conspiracies to throw us off track.
the only reason i posted this was because i was tired of the same conspiracy theories over and over again...
Please DO NOT add to this discussion.
Yes he is. And so long as he continues to write the episodes he writes as well as he does and commission episodes like this, he can mess with my mind as much as he likes.Boblipton 01:44, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
