Forum:Rutan category: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-[Ff]orum archives header +archive)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{archive|Panopticon archives}}[[Category:Category issues]] | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
Now that the species from NA: Shakedown have pages, should we add an Allies of the Rutans subcategory like we have for Daleks? | Now that the species from NA: Shakedown have pages, should we add an Allies of the Rutans subcategory like we have for Daleks? | ||
[[User:Americanwhofan|Americanwhofan]] 21:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC) | [[User:Americanwhofan|Americanwhofan]] 21:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
::If there are species/individuals who can definitively be said to be allies of the Rutans, sure, a category is warranted. There are already several "Allies of" categories, so the precedent's already established. Just make sure that your cat members are '''definitely''', '''unamiguously''' allies of the Rutans. Like I don't think there's a single character in ''Horror of Fang Rock'' that qualifies as an unambiguous ally of the Rutans. But the situation may be different in books, which is really where the Rutans get any sort of definition at all. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 06:43, 24 May 2009 (UTC) | ::If there are species/individuals who can definitively be said to be allies of the Rutans, sure, a category is warranted. There are already several "Allies of" categories, so the precedent's already established. Just make sure that your cat members are '''definitely''', '''unamiguously''' allies of the Rutans. Like I don't think there's a single character in ''Horror of Fang Rock'' that qualifies as an unambiguous ally of the Rutans. But the situation may be different in books, which is really where the Rutans get any sort of definition at all. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 06:43, 24 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 22:55, 6 May 2012
Forums → Archive index → Panopticon archives → Rutan category
Now that the species from NA: Shakedown have pages, should we add an Allies of the Rutans subcategory like we have for Daleks? Americanwhofan 21:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- If there are species/individuals who can definitively be said to be allies of the Rutans, sure, a category is warranted. There are already several "Allies of" categories, so the precedent's already established. Just make sure that your cat members are definitely, unamiguously allies of the Rutans. Like I don't think there's a single character in Horror of Fang Rock that qualifies as an unambiguous ally of the Rutans. But the situation may be different in books, which is really where the Rutans get any sort of definition at all. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 06:43, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
