Forum:Should 2010 Silurians get own article?: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 23:42, 6 May 2012

Forums → Archive index → Panopticon archives → Should 2010 Silurians get own article?

This thread has been archived.

Please create a new thread on the new forums if you want to talk about this topic some more.
Please DO NOT add to this discussion.

Should the new Silurians from Series 5 have their own article? They're a different branch of the species (as the Doctor mentioned) much like the Sea Devils. The Sea Devils have their own article. Why shouldn't the new Silurians? TemporalSpleen 18:22, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:03, 24 May 2011 (edit) CzechOut (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 23:42, 6 May 2012 (edit) (undo) CzechBot (talk \| contribs) m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-[Ff]orum archives header +archive))
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~Forum archives header~~\|Panopticon archives}}[[category:failed proposals]]		{{archive\|Panopticon archives}}[[category:failed proposals]]
	<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->		<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->