Talk:List of companions: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (ArchiveTool: Archiving to Talk:List_of_companions/Archive 1.)
m (ArchiveTool: Archiving to Talk:List_of_companions/Archive 2.)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ArchCat}}
{{ArchCat}}
== Eleventh Doctor Disputed Companions ==
Really? How can one off characters be considered companions, even disputed? This is understandable for characters such as Astrid and Adelaide, who (though I personally don't consider them companions) did fill a companion role in episodes where a regular companion is absent. But saying that Nasreen and Craig could be "companions" is ridiculous! We can't say that every one of the Doctor's many aquaintances is a companion. Otherwise we'd be left with a massive list. [[User:TemporalSpleen|TemporalSpleen]] 21:27, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
* Answering this belatedly:the problem is the definition some fans and other authorities have taken is that a person becomes a companion if they've not only shared an adventure with the Doctor, but done so in the TARDIS. However, that doesn't account for Craig. Blame the BBC for declaring one-off characters like Lady Christina official companions. If The Lodger had been a Christmas special, Craig would have been considered one officially. I do think some level of common sense has to prevail, though. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 21:17, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
== The TARDIS ==
The Doctor's Wife firmly established that the TARDIS isn't a ship, but a full out companion with all rights and privileges thereto. So this reason I added her (and the episode confirmed that it is a her, regardless whose body she borrowed) to the "Special Cases" section in an "Other" category, which I think is fair enough, so that we don't have to pigeonhole her into a specific Doctor. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 21:17, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
==Proposed deletion==
Deletion has been proposed and rationale given on the front page.
===For===
*[[User:Mini-mitch]].  Put {{tl|delete}} and rationale on page.
*{{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''21:15:46 Sun&nbsp;'''26 Jun 2011&nbsp;</span> I'm all for deletion, despite the fact that I've put some work into this page.  It's a waste of our time constantly warring over this page.  Delete it and move on. Navboxes like {{tl|companions of the First Doctor}} have essentially superseded the utility of this list.  Navboxes work better for controversial subjects that aren't well defined in a canonical story.
===Against===
===Discussion===

Latest revision as of 16:51, 5 February 2012

Archive.png
Archives: #1, #2