|
|
| (175 intermediate revisions by 52 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Talk}} | | {{ArchCat}} |
| == Time to add it? ==
| |
| We already know that [[Matt Smith]] will continue as the Doctor in Series 7, but now (according to Matt's FB page) [[John Fay]] will be writing for it as well. [[User:Witoki|Witoki]] 19:15, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| I agree, I also highlighted this announcment in the forums -- [[User:Michael Downey|Michael Downey]] 19:22, June 6, 2011 (UTC) | | ==14 episodes, not 13== |
| | Despite Moffat stating in DWM and other BBC sources stating this, the article continues to treat The Snowmen as a standalone, whereas Moffat, etc have said it was considered a "regular" episode. I'm aware there are rumors that Snowmen might not be in included in the Part 2 DVD/Blu-ray release, but that's beside the point. The episode count should be adjusted accordingly. (And in an earlier thread, now archived, I also questioned whether the 2011 Christmas special, which we now know is not being released or circulated in any way with Series 7 shouldn't be moved to the Series 6 article instead... [[Special:Contributions/70.72.211.35|70.72.211.35]]<sup>[[User talk:70.72.211.35#top|talk to me]]</sup> 13:10, May 20, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| A new source has been commissioned by the BBC stating that 14 new episodes are confirmed and all to be starring Matt Smith. Can this page be created now? -- [[User:Michael Downey|Michael Downey]] 18:45, June 7, 2011 (UTC) - Piers Wenger will also be leaving his position as executive producer -- [[User:Michael Downey|Michael Downey]] 18:48, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
| | ==The Night of the Doctor== |
|
| |
|
| Moffat has now also confirmed "14 eps + Matt DEFINITELY." [http://twitter.com/#!/steven_moffat/status/78139808827981824 here]'''<font color=#609000>d</font> [[User:Witoki|<font color=#609000>●</font>]][[User_talk:Witoki|<font color=#FF6090>●</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Witoki|<font color=#6090FF>●</font>]]''' 15:24, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
| | Should ''[[The Night of the Doctor]]'' be considered part of this run or Series 8? [[User:Silent Hunter UK|Silent Hunter UK]] [[User talk:Silent Hunter UK|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:28, November 14, 2013 (UTC) |
| * He also confirmed it will be broadcast in 2012
| |
|
| |
|
| So now we have official confirmation can this page be made and then locked? -- [[User:Michael Downey|Michael Downey]] 16:29, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
| | == No "doctor2" in this series == |
|
| |
|
| :Both of you have asked, and the answer is no. It way to early to even think about making it. Yes, we have a BBC source, but it is too early, to premature to make it. It will be made after Series 6 has finished airing. [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 15:18, June 9, 2011 (UTC) | | For those who think that the [[War Doctor]] should be added to the infobox in the "doctor2" field, here is an explanation why it must not be done: |
| | {{quote|The doctor2 variable is only for Doctors who actually had a solo adventure in [the] year. Thus, there is no doctor2 in season 10, season 20, or season 22, but there is one in season 21 and season 4. The doctor2 should be considered the one that has the minority of episodes in the season. So in season 4, doctor2 is the First Doctor.|Documentation for the Infobox Series template|Template:Infobox Series}} |
| | Please do not use this field of the infobox. [[User:Amorkuz|Amorkuz]] [[User talk:Amorkuz|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:15, July 1, 2018 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| ::Why is it premature to be made? This wikia go's of solid facts and we have them therefore they should be documented. I know all admins panic when making pages likes these because of vandals and rumours but all you can do is state the facts and then lock it! -- [[User:Michael Downey|Michael Downey]] 15:21, June 9, 2011 (UTC)
| | There is another minisode, based during Series 7B. |
| | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EONO8pUP-9s |
| ::I agree with Michael Downey, the Series 6 page was created while Series 5 was still going. I think a good example was the Series 5 (The Sarah Jane Adventures) page. It was created while Series 3 was still going as the BBC had confirmed episodes starring Elisabeth Sladen. That's all it had written on it. Something like "Series 5 of The Sarah Jane Adventures has been confirmed to be broadcast in 2011 by the BBC. Elisabeth Sladen will resume her role as Sarah Jane Smith" and then a reference to a BBC page. That was all. Of course, after Lis Sladen's tragic death, that page got a bit rumourful, but I think it was good until then. We should create a Series 6 page that says: "Series 6 or Season 33 has been confirmed to be broadcast in 2012. It will consist of 14 episodes, one of which will be written by John Fay. Matt Smith will reprise his role as the Doctor" and lock it until later. Its premature, but its been done and worked before. [[User:Bigredrabbit|Bigredrabbit]] 06:22, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| The BBC is now ''loudly'' talking about it, and [http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/dw/news/bulletin_110608_01/Fourteen_New_Episodes a post is up] on the Doctor Who website as well. '''<font color=#609000>d</font> [[User:Witoki|<font color=#609000>●</font>]][[User_talk:Witoki|<font color=#FF6090>●</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Witoki|<font color=#6090FF>●</font>]]''' 15:53, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Oh come on now ==
| |
| | |
| Apparently, we're getting a full Series 7, just [http://www.ugo.com/tv/doctor-who-no-full-series-2012 not all of it in 2012]. Ugh. '''<font color=#609000>d</font> [[User:Witoki|<font color=#609000>●</font>]][[User_talk:Witoki|<font color=#FF6090>●</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Witoki|<font color=#6090FF>●</font>]]''' 21:56, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| * Though there's already murmurs that the plan might be a late 2012 / early 2013 season and then another full 2013 season for the 50th anniversary... could be interesting. '''<font color=#609000>d</font> [[User:Witoki|<font color=#609000>●</font>]][[User_talk:Witoki|<font color=#FF6090>●</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Witoki|<font color=#6090FF>●</font>]]''' 22:03, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Rumors ==
| |
| | |
| Just a quick point on the rumors section, if you read the sources, they never actually say that River or Jack are going to come back, just a "maybe or maybe not, who knows, could be, I hope so." That's not a rumor. A rumor is "a statement or claim of questionable accuracy, from no known reliable source, usually spread by word of mouth." They aren't actually making a statement or claim in the sources. Therefore, the 'rumors' about River and Jack should be removed. --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:darkblue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 18:13, August 5, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :Both of them are rumours. Rumours mean "uncertain or doubtful of the truth" (Oxford English Dictionary). Both rumours link to series 7, the site has been noted to be very reliable in the past and also, it uses interviews as their sources for each. The site does not make up the rumours, nor are they confirmed facts. They have interviews which hint towards it, which makes it a rumour. If the way it's word suggests it a rumour then we add it. Of course we won't add "We hope Jack will be back", but if it says Matt Smith, Steven Moffat, Alex Kingston or whoever has hinted at the return of X and the source mentions series 7, then it becomes a rumour. [[User:Mini-mitch|MM]]/<small>[[User talk:Mini-mitch|Want to talk?]]</small> 18:22, August 5, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| :Your problem is that the sources are just that: "We hope they will be back." In the source for River, all that point towards River returning is this: “I’d love to [return]. As long as we feel that there are still stories to tell, I’m happy to continue.” That is not a factual statement that is doubtful of the truth. That is a stated desire; Kingston ''wants'' to return. We have nothing more than that to go on from that source. This is excatly the same as the discussion we had over Torchwood. Their return might be hinted with "maybe they will come back," but they also say" who knows if I will come back?" --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:darkblue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 18:42, August 5, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Between 2012 and 2013 ==
| |
| This is untrue. I don't believe it. It can't be spread over two years. This should be deleted immediantly. And actually I think the page should be deleted. [[User:BroadcastCorp|BroadcastCorp]] <small>([[User talk:BroadcastCorp|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/BroadcastCorp|contribs]])</small> 15:48, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| :What don't you believe? An official BBC spokesman? They will do what they need, want and must do, so saying it "can't" is does not really mean anything, but everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I also don't like the idea, but I added it since it was an official BBC spokesman that said it, and their are numerous sources for it. There no need for this page to be deleted, it serves it purpose, which is too gather all the information of series 7, since information is already been told and leaked about it. [[User:Mini-mitch|MM]]/<small>[[User talk:Mini-mitch|Want to talk?]]</small> 16:00, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| They may be lying. You never know. Perhaps they're just trying to tease us into thinking it. I'm glad you two don't like the idea, and I would be suprised if you did like the idea. But remember, this is against policy. We don't have an in-universe proof that it will be spread over two years. Also, [[Steven Moffat]] is against this<ref>http://doctorwhotv.co.uk/doctor-who-not-reduced-in-2012-22347.htm</ref>. [[User:BroadcastCorp|BroadcastCorp]] <small>([[User talk:BroadcastCorp|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/BroadcastCorp|contribs]])</small> 18:16, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Pedantry ==
| |
| | |
| There's some punctuation and spacing issues with this article. I'd fix myself them but it's locked.
| |
Despite Moffat stating in DWM and other BBC sources stating this, the article continues to treat The Snowmen as a standalone, whereas Moffat, etc have said it was considered a "regular" episode. I'm aware there are rumors that Snowmen might not be in included in the Part 2 DVD/Blu-ray release, but that's beside the point. The episode count should be adjusted accordingly. (And in an earlier thread, now archived, I also questioned whether the 2011 Christmas special, which we now know is not being released or circulated in any way with Series 7 shouldn't be moved to the Series 6 article instead... 70.72.211.35talk to me 13:10, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
Should The Night of the Doctor be considered part of this run or Series 8? Silent Hunter UK ☎ 19:28, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
No "doctor2" in this series[[edit source]]
For those who think that the War Doctor should be added to the infobox in the "doctor2" field, here is an explanation why it must not be done:
The doctor2 variable is only for Doctors who actually had a solo adventure in [the] year. Thus, there is no doctor2 in season 10, season 20, or season 22, but there is one in season 21 and season 4. The doctor2 should be considered the one that has the minority of episodes in the season. So in season 4, doctor2 is the First Doctor.Documentation for the Infobox Series template [Template:Infobox Series [src]]
Please do not use this field of the infobox. Amorkuz ☎ 22:15, July 1, 2018 (UTC)
There is another minisode, based during Series 7B.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EONO8pUP-9s
