Forum:Near-human: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-{{Forumheader|Reference desk}} +{{Archive|Reference desk archives}})) |
m (Per Thread:120763, near-human appears not to exist in any valid source. scruffy end) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archive|Reference desk archives}} | {{Archive|Reference desk archives}} | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> | ||
If anyone ever runs across the term | If anyone ever runs across the term near-human in any bit of fiction anywhere in the DWU, please put a reference here for me. If in a book, it'd be helpful if you could give the page number. The near-human article really needs a source for the actual term. Thanks :) {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''01:41:40 Tue '''14 Jun 2011 </span> | ||
:There's shouldn't be any reference to it; I just needed a convenient term when making the category, so I took it from ''[[Star Wars]]''. We really need to either rename the category or remove it entirely. I haven't seen a specific canonical term for those pseudo-human species, but there have been canonical references to the fact that the species look visually identical, so it's probably worth keeping in some form. -<[[User:Azes13|Azes13]] 02:26, June 14, 2011 (UTC)>- | :There's shouldn't be any reference to it; I just needed a convenient term when making the category, so I took it from ''[[Star Wars]]''. We really need to either rename the category or remove it entirely. I haven't seen a specific canonical term for those pseudo-human species, but there have been canonical references to the fact that the species look visually identical, so it's probably worth keeping in some form. -<[[User:Azes13|Azes13]] 02:26, June 14, 2011 (UTC)>- | ||
Latest revision as of 06:53, 4 April 2013
Forums → Archive index → Reference desk archives → Near-human
If anyone ever runs across the term near-human in any bit of fiction anywhere in the DWU, please put a reference here for me. If in a book, it'd be helpful if you could give the page number. The near-human article really needs a source for the actual term. Thanks :)
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 01:41:40 Tue 14 Jun 2011
- There's shouldn't be any reference to it; I just needed a convenient term when making the category, so I took it from Star Wars. We really need to either rename the category or remove it entirely. I haven't seen a specific canonical term for those pseudo-human species, but there have been canonical references to the fact that the species look visually identical, so it's probably worth keeping in some form. -<Azes13 02:26, June 14, 2011 (UTC)>-
