Talk:Rutan: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (Scrooge MacDuck moved page Talk:Rutan Host to Talk:Rutan) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Okay, let's just begin this discusion now. Which main image should we use? While the Video Game image is the more recent image of the Rutans, the episode is more significant. We can't decide on appearances because they both have appeard equally, so let's discuss here. | Okay, let's just begin this discusion now. Which main image should we use? While the Video Game image is the more recent image of the Rutans, the episode is more significant. We can't decide on appearances because they both have appeard equally, so let's discuss here. | ||
:I personally think we should use the more recent [[ | :I personally think we should use the more recent [[GAME]] image, as we do with most villians that return with a significant role. ([[Sontaran]], [[Macra]], [[Dalek]], [[Davros]], etc.) [[User:OttselSpy25|OttselSpy25]] <sup>[[User talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me]]</sup> 16:49, November 8, 2011 (UTC) | ||
Not really. Does the infobox for [[Dalek]] show one from ''[[City of the Daleks (video game)|City of the Daleks]]'', or even that cameo in ''[[The Wedding of River Song]]'' - no. Does the page for [[Sontaran]] show one from this game - no. Should they? - No! In any case, the image your proposing is definitely not infobox material. It has two unrelated individuals in it and the Rutans are difficult to pick out. In any case, there is absolutely nothing wrong with the image from ''[[Horror of Fang Rock|Horror]]'', so I can't see a need to change it.--{{User:Skittles the hog/sig}} 17:04, November 8, 2011 (UTC) | Not really. Does the infobox for [[Dalek]] show one from ''[[City of the Daleks (video game)|City of the Daleks]]'', or even that cameo in ''[[The Wedding of River Song]]'' - no. Does the page for [[Sontaran]] show one from this game - no. Should they? - No! In any case, the image your proposing is definitely not infobox material. It has two unrelated individuals in it and the Rutans are difficult to pick out. In any case, there is absolutely nothing wrong with the image from ''[[Horror of Fang Rock|Horror]]'', so I can't see a need to change it.--{{User:Skittles the hog/sig}} 17:04, November 8, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:I do believe the infobox image should feature the latest design of the Rutans, but I agree that picture isn't the best to illustrate it. How about [http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/apps/vision/gallery/assets/orig//doctorwho/monsters/rutans/d11/s02_tag/furniture/tag_2011_rutan_main.jpg this one] [[User:JenniBee|JenniBee]] <sup>[[User talk:JenniBee|talk to me]]</sup> 15:18, November 25, 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:12, 28 April 2021
Main image[[edit]]
Okay, let's just begin this discusion now. Which main image should we use? While the Video Game image is the more recent image of the Rutans, the episode is more significant. We can't decide on appearances because they both have appeard equally, so let's discuss here.
- I personally think we should use the more recent GAME image, as we do with most villians that return with a significant role. (Sontaran, Macra, Dalek, Davros, etc.) OttselSpy25 talk to me 16:49, November 8, 2011 (UTC)
Not really. Does the infobox for Dalek show one from City of the Daleks, or even that cameo in The Wedding of River Song - no. Does the page for Sontaran show one from this game - no. Should they? - No! In any case, the image your proposing is definitely not infobox material. It has two unrelated individuals in it and the Rutans are difficult to pick out. In any case, there is absolutely nothing wrong with the image from Horror, so I can't see a need to change it.--Skittles the hog - talk 17:04, November 8, 2011 (UTC)
- I do believe the infobox image should feature the latest design of the Rutans, but I agree that picture isn't the best to illustrate it. How about this one JenniBee talk to me 15:18, November 25, 2011 (UTC)
