Forum:List formatting: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Should we use < li> or < br>?)
 
m (Sorry for having to do this, but I'm being forced to change my sig, and clean up after it, by Wikia Staff)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Forumheader|Panopticon}}
{{archive|Panopticon archives}}[[category:design changers]]
Main text most commonly uses list format (expressed with < ul> and < li> tags) for lists of 4 items or more.
Main text most commonly uses list format (expressed with < ul> and < li> tags) for lists of 4 items or more.
However, we seem to have shied away from using lists in infoboxes and in tables, preferring instead to separate items with a < br />, doing away with the dot in front of each line.  I've seen such infobox lists stretch for over 20 items.
However, we seem to have shied away from using lists in infoboxes and in tables, preferring instead to separate items with a < br />, doing away with the dot in front of each line.  I've seen such infobox lists stretch for over 20 items.


Did we ever reach a consensus on proper style for lists in main text, in infoboxes,  
Did we ever reach a consensus on proper style for lists in main text, in infoboxes,  
and in tables?
and in tables? -- {{unsigned|Gousha}}
== Archivist's note ==
No one answered this thread, perhaps because it was originally unsigned.  [[T:NO HTML]] forbids the use of HTML ul/li tage directly in text. The infobox redesign since this thread was started doesn't establish a single standard.  Instead, it's generally recommended that bulleted lists be avoided, preferring comma-separated lists.  If there are a large number of points, the template {{tl|bp}} provides a standardised approach to vertical listing.  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}19:18: Wed&nbsp;02 May 2012&nbsp;</span>

Latest revision as of 04:01, 28 August 2012

ForumsArchive indexPanopticon archives → List formatting
This thread has been archived.
Please create a new thread on the new forums if you want to talk about this topic some more.
Please DO NOT add to this discussion.

Main text most commonly uses list format (expressed with < ul> and < li> tags) for lists of 4 items or more. However, we seem to have shied away from using lists in infoboxes and in tables, preferring instead to separate items with a < br />, doing away with the dot in front of each line. I've seen such infobox lists stretch for over 20 items.

Did we ever reach a consensus on proper style for lists in main text, in infoboxes, and in tables? -- The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gousha (talk • contribs) .

Archivist's note[[edit source]]

No one answered this thread, perhaps because it was originally unsigned. T:NO HTML forbids the use of HTML ul/li tage directly in text. The infobox redesign since this thread was started doesn't establish a single standard. Instead, it's generally recommended that bulleted lists be avoided, preferring comma-separated lists. If there are a large number of points, the template {{bp}} provides a standardised approach to vertical listing.
czechout<staff />   19:18: Wed 02 May 2012