231,276
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1506468-20190827123101/@comment-1350697-20190910044948 (edit)
Revision as of 13:32, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Thanks, and, yeah, there doesn't seem to be an immediately applicable rule -- [[T:OFF REL#Novels]] is clearly about ''paper'' prose fiction, of the kind Amazon can physically deliver to your door, and doesn't meaningfully keep ebook releases of any kind in mind. | Thanks, and, yeah, there doesn't seem to be an immediately applicable rule -- [[T:OFF REL#Novels]] is clearly about ''paper'' prose fiction, of the kind Amazon can physically deliver to your door, and doesn't meaningfully keep ebook releases of any kind in mind. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 14: | ||
I, again, do not see anything here that would invalidate a story for having been released as part of a blog post. '''There does not seem to me to exist in [[T:BOUND|the rules as they currently exist]] any such bar for a story to clear.''' | I, again, do not see anything here that would invalidate a story for having been released as part of a blog post. '''There does not seem to me to exist in [[T:BOUND|the rules as they currently exist]] any such bar for a story to clear.''' | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190827123101-1506468/20190910044948-1350697]]</noinclude> | ||