231,276
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-10983683-20140811212412/@comment-26845762-20160804134121 (edit)
Revision as of 19:59, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The only problem with listing all the stories as NON-DWU is that some of them are. David Tennant is just playing the regular Tenth Doctor in ''Attack of the Grask''. The choose-your-own-adventure books are the about the "real" Doctors. The only reason these are invalid is that their stories are fluid. | The only problem with listing all the stories as NON-DWU is that some of them are. David Tennant is just playing the regular Tenth Doctor in ''Attack of the Grask''. The choose-your-own-adventure books are the about the "real" Doctors. The only reason these are invalid is that their stories are fluid. | ||
| Line 12: | Line 11: | ||
My one wonder is this: if we list NONVALID appearances in lists, would they also be put into the infoboxes of characters/species without lists of appearances? | My one wonder is this: if we list NONVALID appearances in lists, would they also be put into the infoboxes of characters/species without lists of appearances? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20140811212412-10983683/20160804134121-26845762]]</noinclude> | ||