229,659
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-2162194-20130713192557/@comment-5918438-20160115033736 (edit)
Revision as of 22:22, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Fascinating. So yeah, that's what we use. He/him pronouns, and mother/daughter terminology. No quotation marks like saying "mother". | Fascinating. So yeah, that's what we use. He/him pronouns, and mother/daughter terminology. No quotation marks like saying "mother". | ||
I'm interested, though, in finding out too if these cases of all getting one gendered pronoun also explicitly state the sex and/or gender of the people themselves. I wouldn't necessarily say, when we're talking about non-humans ''certainly'', that "male pronouns" equals "male gender", or if they're all just another case of writers lazily using masculine pronouns as somehow gender-neutral, which is certainly quite outdated. | I'm interested, though, in finding out too if these cases of all getting one gendered pronoun also explicitly state the sex and/or gender of the people themselves. I wouldn't necessarily say, when we're talking about non-humans ''certainly'', that "male pronouns" equals "male gender", or if they're all just another case of writers lazily using masculine pronouns as somehow gender-neutral, which is certainly quite outdated. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130713192557-2162194/20160115033736-5918438]]</noinclude> | ||