231,276
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-26975268-20130201045831/@comment-26975268-20130205225344 (edit)
Revision as of 22:50, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) Tag: Disambiguation links |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Okay, we're obviously not understanding each other on this matter, but I nevertheless have a feeling that we're both talking about the same thing regardless. Just to clarify, I mean that we should '''split up articles that ''do'' have both in-universe and out-of-universe information in into [[Date]] and [[Date (real world)]]''', as opposed to just moving the articles that '''don't have in-universe information to [[Date (real world)]]'''. I'm sure you think that this is a given, but I just to want clarify. | Okay, we're obviously not understanding each other on this matter, but I nevertheless have a feeling that we're both talking about the same thing regardless. Just to clarify, I mean that we should '''split up articles that ''do'' have both in-universe and out-of-universe information in into [[Date]] and [[Date (real world)]]''', as opposed to just moving the articles that '''don't have in-universe information to [[Date (real world)]]'''. I'm sure you think that this is a given, but I just to want clarify. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130201045831-26975268/20130205225344-26975268]]</noinclude> | ||